Survey reveals mixed response to Conveyancing Quality Scheme

Print This Post

By Legal Futures

9 August 2012


Conveyancing: most with CQS said it helped with lender panels

Just over half of conveyancing firms have applied for accreditation under the Law Society’s Conveyancing Quality Scheme (CQS), with those yet to do so unconvinced of the benefits, according to new research.

The survey of 586 conveyancers by Searches UK found that 52% had applied for CQS (including 4.3% who had been rejected), and that more than four out of five believed it had helped their firms maintain or achieve panel membership with some lenders.

There was also hope that the society’s recently announced professional indemnity insurance package for those with CQS accreditation would lead to lower premiums, although some respondents were sceptical about this happening.

However, there was a mixed response to an open question for respondents’ overall opinion of CQS. Some considered it “excellent”, others a process-driven scheme that does not judge knowledge of the law, while a number saw it as having limited value (“to an extent, a ‘brand within a brand’,” said one) or even being a waste of time and money.

Error, group does not exist! Check your syntax! (ID: 14)

Of those yet to apply for CQS, more than two-thirds (69%) said they had no intention of doing so soon. Some were ineligible, like licensed conveyancers – although 70% of respondents thought CQS should be open to them – while others, such as sole practitioners, felt it would not be worth their while as they would still face enormous difficulties in getting on panels. “A few have no intention of joining because they simply do not believe in the merits of the scheme,” the survey reported.

Some 58% of respondents also thought search providers should be able to apply for CQS, a position Searches UK managing director Andrew Stenning said he supported. “Searches are a vital part of any conveyancing transaction and Searches UK believes that the conveyancing process would be further better regulated and quality assured if search providers, as well as other professions within the conveyancing industry were also allowed to join.”

 

Tags: , , , ,



Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

Know your client checks – A lesson from BHS

Paul-Bennett for Legal Futures

As you will be aware, it is a legal requirement for advisory firms to carry out ‘know your client’ checks. The purpose of doing so is to confirm your client’s identity and to seek to provide protection in respect of anti-money laundering (AML) and terrorist financing laws. The BHS experience before the House of Commons’ work and pensions committee and business, innovation and skills committee shows that firms need to think beyond AML obligations.

September 29th, 2016