Survey: firms need better hold of “levers of profitability” to make most of clients and staff

Print This Post

10 December 2012


Future profits: do firms understand why clients choose them?

Law firms are not maximising the potential in either their clients or their staff, according to new benchmarking research seen by Legal Futures.

Firms reported very different results from cross-selling, for example, with the most successful firms reporting an average, across the whole portfolio, of two specialisms per client. For firms at the other extreme, only 10% of clients use more than one service.

The level of payback from competitive tenders also differed widely, with success rates ranging from 10% to 100%, while the numbers of clients where write-off occurred ranged from 1% to an estimated 50% by one participant.

The research forms the bedrock of a new benchmarking tool launched by The Thriving Company to help firms understand how well they are positioned to drive growth in revenue and profit. An initial 25 firms reviewed a range of so-called “key levers of future profitability”, comparing how well they are set up to grow future billings, manage costs, and improve profitability.

It found that many firms have already implemented value-based pricing, tracking and logging of referrals, and effective identification of the major potential referrers of work across other professional advisors. However, only around half objectively understood the most important factors that drove choice of law firms in their target market, and only about a third used this insight when training staff or measuring their performance.

Robin Dicks, director of The Thriving Company, said: “There is a disconnect between the capabilities that allow firms to win and retain work in their markets, and investments in training or performance management which currently have little financial benefit.”

When it comes to boosting the productivity of people, two-fifths of firms used staff surveys to fully understand how staff performance could be improved, and while only one in five operated 360° feedback to improve leader and team performance. However, Mr Dicks said appetite for this seems to be growing.

Mr Dicks said his tool is different from other benchmark surveys because instead of comparing past performance, “it gets to the nub of what drives future performance”.

The self-review is free to undertake for Legal Futures readers, who can access an online self-review of their own performance and gain a confidential summary comparison of their performance against peers via this link.

 



Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

The rise of the multi-disciplinary lawyer: A challenge for legal education

Catrina Denvir

The legal profession has been on the receiving end of much hype regarding the impact of technology. Recent commentators purport that the aspiring lawyer must be a triple threat, possessing knowledge of the law, coding expertise, and in-depth knowledge of legal technology. Yet, focusing on legal technology risks overlooking the need for skills that transcend latest fads. Legal technology is a means by which to handle data: to organise it, record it, extract it, analyse it, predict from it and leverage it. Quantitative and statistical literacy – the ability to understand, apply, visualise and infer from data – underpins technological literacy and yet receives very little attention from those who encourage innovation in the legal curriculum.

May 26th, 2017