SRA to ask solicitors what they think about misconduct offences

Print This Post

15 July 2015


the Cube

SRA: clear framework could help demonstrate fairness to BME firms

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) is to ask solicitors how they judge the seriousness of misconduct offences in a new initiative on professional standards.

The move, to be launched at the SRA’s board meeting in Birmingham today, will result in a policy statement and decision-making framework for the regulator’s staff.

The SRA said a clear framework could help it in “demonstrating fairness” towards BME firms.

According to papers published ahead of the meeting, external consultants will run a survey on standards with a “representative sample” of the profession this month and next.

“The survey will comprise a set of short scenarios around solicitors’ conduct, and will gather views on issues such as the seriousness of an offence, and factors which may exacerbate this such as intent and harm. This will feed into the development of both the policy statement and the framework.”

The SRA said that from October 2015 to January 2016 it would run a full consultation on its draft policy statement and framework.

“This will be supported by a series of events around the country, some in conjunction with local and regional law societies.”

The regulator said that Professor Gus John’s report on disproportionality in the its approach to BME firms last year showed that “a lack of clarity about professional standards and thresholds for action may adversely affect the fair and equal treatment” of BME solicitors.

“Providing a clear framework for decision-making and improving consistency will provide a mechanism for monitoring and demonstrating fairness in our approach.”

The SRA said it would also seek the views of the public and consumers on professional standards through a “range of avenues”, including by working with Citizens Advice.

The regulator added that a clear decision-making framework would improve the “consistency and quality” of decisions by staff and increase confidence in the profession.

Tags: , , ,



Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

Rating lawyers by their wins and losses – a good idea?

Robert Ambrogi

Lawyers will give you any number of reasons why their win-loss rates in court are not accurate reflections of their legal skills. Yet a growing number of companies are evaluating lawyers by this standard – compiling and analysing lawyers’ litigation track records to help consumers and businesses make more-informed hiring decisions. The shortcomings of evaluating lawyers by win rates are many. Not least of them is that so few cases ever make it to a win or loss. Of equal concern is that, in the nuances of law practice, it is not always obvious what constitutes a win or a loss.

February 22nd, 2017