SRA issues warning over inducements ban

Print This Post

17 September 2014


Livesley: firms will need to use their judgement

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) will not introduce specific rules to deal with the upcoming legislative ban on personal injury (PI) law firms paying inducements to claim, but has pledged to take “strong enforcement action” if firms breach it.

It also emerged at yesterday’s PI Futures conference in Manchester that it has only two ongoing formal investigations into breaches of the referral fee ban.

Tim Livesley, the SRA’s chief economist, told the 200 delegates that the regulator had learned lessons from last year’s referral fee ban, including that the core code of conduct principles were “more important” than the specific outcomes it introduced.

This meant no new outcomes were going to be drafted to deal with the inducements ban currently going through Parliament in the Criminal Justice and Courts Bill.

Error, group does not exist! Check your syntax! (ID: 14)

He cited five principles that were relevant: the requirements to uphold the rule of law/administration of justice, to act with integrity, to act in the best interests of each client, to maintain public trust, and to comply with legal obligations.

Ultimately, Mr Livesley emphasised, “firms will need to use their judgement” on whether they are complying with the ban, and the SRA will “take strong enforcement action when there is evidence principles are breached”.

The regulator will review and update its guidance on inducements and “closely monitor reports made to us for 12 months”. At the same time, he said the SRA had not seen evidence that inducements as such were causing problems – it was more about misleading advertising. The SRA is to conduct a “targeted review of data on cold calling and misleading advertising”.

On the referral fee ban, Mr Livesley said all the evidence was that “firms are interpreting it pretty well”, with just the two firms subject to formal investigations. No decisions have yet been made on whether they will face enforcement action.

On other issues in the personal injury market, the SRA is to look at the “perceived risks” associated with law firm ownership of medical reporting agencies. The Ministry of Justice is currently planning to ban law firms from using their own agencies for their own cases.

Mr Livesley, who also manages the SRA’s risk analysis team, said others risks to PI consumers include firms under commercial pressure moving into areas where they are not competent – leading to under-settlements – and poor information to consumers being advised under conditional fee agreements about what they might have to pay if the case is dropped.

Tags: , ,



Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

Lawyers must now draw on the data and drive change

Chris Marston 2014

The results from this year’s legal services consumer tracker survey make for interesting reading. In its sixth year, the research finds that a firm’s reputation continues to grow in importance, holding its top slot as the number one factor influencing choice of lawyer, with price remaining a strong second, reflected in a shift towards higher numbers of fixed-fee transactions. Alongside, it reports that trust in lawyers has declined to 42%, from 47% in 2012. It’s useful information as far as it goes, but what is the sector going to do with it?

September 26th, 2016