SRA delays second phase of reforms on submitting accountants’ reports

Print This Post

13 March 2015


SRA

SRA: “Almost universal welcome” for direction of travel

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has delayed the introduction of the second phase of its reforms of the rules on submitting accountants’ reports from next month to November this year.

The regulator said professional bodies and firms had expressed concerns about “potential wasted costs” where interim reports under the old system had already been commissioned.

The SRA said that there was an “almost universal welcome” of its direction of travel in seeking to reduce the burdens on firms in terms of accountants’ reports, following a consultation on the issue launched in November.

However, the regulator went on: “Many respondents stressed the need to reform the Accounts Rules themselves prior to agreeing any new framework for reporting.

“Given the SRA’s stated intention to reform the Accounts Rules in 2016, there were worries that these measures would lead to extra costs for accountants and firms coming to terms with a new system which would shortly be subject to more radical change.

“Concerns were also expressed at the intention to implement the new rules for firms with accounting periods ending in April 2015. Larger firms, it was said, would have already conducted interim work with reporting accountants under the old regime.

“More generally, there would be insufficient time for accountants to get to grips with the new process and this could lead to reporting delays and again increased costs.”

As a result, the SRA board this week agreed to go ahead with the proposed approach to the reforms in principle, including a change in report format to put more emphasis on the professional judgment of accountants, while officials finalised the “detailed drafting points and providing guidance on key issues”.

The board also agreed that “further modelling and assessment” was needed before a decision could be taken to exempt further categories of firms, for example those with annual turnovers of less than £10,000, from the requirements.

The board agreed that firms should not be required to make an annual declaration on their PC returns when accountants’ reports were submitted, as existing rules were adequate.

Tags: , ,



Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

Rating lawyers by their wins and losses – a good idea?

Robert Ambrogi

Lawyers will give you any number of reasons why their win-loss rates in court are not accurate reflections of their legal skills. Yet a growing number of companies are evaluating lawyers by this standard – compiling and analysing lawyers’ litigation track records to help consumers and businesses make more-informed hiring decisions. The shortcomings of evaluating lawyers by win rates are many. Not least of them is that so few cases ever make it to a win or loss. Of equal concern is that, in the nuances of law practice, it is not always obvious what constitutes a win or a loss.

February 22nd, 2017