SRA to consult profession and public on ethical values

Print This Post

27 November 2014


More to the SRA than “having a big stick”

The Solicitors Regulation Authority is planning a major consultation on ethical values with the profession and the public next summer, chief executive Paul Philip announced yesterday.

Mr Philip said although the SRA would press ahead with proportionate regulation and getting rid of red tape, there would be a “real commitment” to professional values and “what it means to be a solicitor”.

Speaking at the SRA’s annual conference for COLPs and COFAs in Birmingham yesterday, Mr Philip asked: “What can you expect from us and what can the public expect in terms of terms of trust, confidentiality and most importantly integrity?

“I am keen that we have a debate and discussion about these principles.”

Error, group does not exist! Check your syntax! (ID: 14)

He said thought leadership was important for a regulator, rather than “simply having a big stick and whacking people”.

Mr Philip added that members of the public expected solicitors to be “a bit more ethical” than ordinary people, as well as more ethical than accountants.

A report by Birmingham University, based on interviews with almost 1,000 solicitors and barrister, warned this week that the “unbalanced promotion of competition” in the legal services market was putting ethical standards at risk.

Richard Moorhead, professor of law and professional ethics at University College London, told the conference that there was a tendency for firms to think about ethics in terms of one or two individuals who were “bad apples”, or a few bad firms. He encouraged lawyers instead to think about people taking “bad decisions in bad circumstances”.

He said there was a lack of training about ethics for law students, at a vocational level but particularly on undergraduate courses. “Our woefully inadequate law schools tend to train people to be amoral, rather than moral practitioners. Students do not enter the profession with a good grounding on who they should be.”

Professor Moorhead said lawyering had been seen by some in the past as a “license for insincerity” and just getting about getting the best results for clients.

He referred to research by Harvard University, which suggested that people who thought of themselves as professionals had much lower ethical standards than those who saw themselves as employees.

Professor Moorhead concluded that law firms needed to be encouraged to “fundamentally rethink incentives”, in areas like promotion criteria. He said incentives should be aligned so that it was “in nobody’s interest to take too big a risk”.

Although simply being a professional did not improve ethical decision-making, it did improve when people were “genuinely committed to the ideas and practice of professionals”.

He added that law firms were “behind the curve in developing their ethical infrastructure”.

During a panel discussion, Iain Miller, partner and head of regulatory law at Bevan Brittan, said: “For a number of years, we haven’t valued ethics, which feeds through from training to behaviours.”

He predicted that as the market changed and the nature of businesses changed, ethics could be a “differentiator” for some firms, which they could show how they trained staff and made decisions. “Some clients may prefer an ethical law firm. Some may not.”


Tags: , ,

One Response to “SRA to consult profession and public on ethical values”

  1. Nice report and many thanks for covering my talk in such depth. I’d like to make clear its the ethical education in Law Schools that I think is woefully inadequate. We can improve on other things too of course but professional ethics is often absent from UG curricula and weakly dealt with on vocational courses.

  2. Richard Moorhead on November 27th, 2014 at 8:23 am

Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

The LSB’s proposals for legislative reform: let’s be clear

Caroline Wallace LSB

The publication of the Legal Services Board’s vision for legislative reform of legal services regulation on 12 September has generated a healthy level of interest and debate. This can, on the surface, seem a somewhat dry subject. However, it has an impact not just on existing regulated practitioners, but also on providers of legal services more generally, as well as everyone who uses or benefits from an effective legal sector. And, let’s face it, that’s all of us.

October 25th, 2016