SRA cedes handling of insolvency complaints

Print This Post

By Legal Futures

10 September 2012


Bible: move will increase public confidence

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has brought in the Insolvency Practitioners Association (IPA) to handle complaints against solicitor insolvency practitioners.

It follows of the way the SRA deals with insolvency related complaints.

The IPA and SRA are two of seven professional bodies that can authorise their members to act as insolvency practitioners. The IPA is the only one specialising in insolvency and it described the move as “a significant step in furthering the drive for consistency in the handling of complaints across the insolvency profession”.

IPA president Edward Bible, himself a solicitor and head of insolvency at Brethertons, said: “We welcome this move. It helps the SRA meet the requirements placed upon it as an insolvency regulator, whilst utilising the experience and specialist skills within the IPA team to best effect in the interests of the profession as a whole.

“At a time when we are working to increase public confidence in the processes for dealing with complaints against IPs, this can only help; it provides economies of scale, reduces the number of different bodies handling these complaints, and as a solicitor and president of the IPA this year I am particularly pleased to be able to announce this new arrangement.”

IPA chief executive David Kerr added: “Solicitors are an integral part of the insolvency profession, and our relationship with the SRA has grown over the last three years. I am delighted that we have been able to take that to a new level in an area of regulatory activity that is very much in the spotlight at the moment.

“It not only works well for the bodies directly concerned, but it represents an important illustration of the ability of regulators to operate in unison where appropriate in the public interest.”

In its annual review of regulation, published in May, the Insolvency Service said the SRA was not handling complaints in accordance with the principles underpinning regulation that had been agreed with the government.

Further, the SRA’s move to outcomes-focused regulation “is not compatible” with the IS’s drive for greater consistency in complaint-handling and sanctions across the seven professional bodies. This is because the SRA will not investigate all complaints received, but will use the information received to form a risk profile for firms, it said.

Tags: , ,



One Response to “SRA cedes handling of insolvency complaints”

  1. I understand the logic, I think, of not investigating all complaints from the SRAs perspective, but from the complainant’s perspective this -if transparent – would be maddening and one wonders at the legality of it. And, after all, we are dealing here with conduct complaints – perhaps therefore more serious than service complaints.

  2. Richard Moorhead on September 10th, 2012 at 9:57 am

Legal Futures Blog

Rating lawyers by their wins and losses – a good idea?

Robert Ambrogi

Lawyers will give you any number of reasons why their win-loss rates in court are not accurate reflections of their legal skills. Yet a growing number of companies are evaluating lawyers by this standard – compiling and analysing lawyers’ litigation track records to help consumers and businesses make more-informed hiring decisions. The shortcomings of evaluating lawyers by win rates are many. Not least of them is that so few cases ever make it to a win or loss. Of equal concern is that, in the nuances of law practice, it is not always obvious what constitutes a win or a loss.

February 22nd, 2017