SRA abandons indemnity cover cut this year after LSB warning

Print This Post

19 August 2014


Chris Kenny

Kenny: “general absence of data” in all the submissions

The Legal Services Board (LSB) has extended the time it has given itself to decide on the proposed cut in the minimum indemnity cover limit for law firms from 10 October this year to 17 August 2015.

The SRA responded by announcing that the change “will not now come into effect before October 2014”.

The LSB’s decision came in a warning notice issued to the Law Society, informing the society that it was “considering whether to refuse in part” plans by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) to cut the limit from £2m to £500,000.

The main reason given by the LSB in the notice, served under the Legal Services Act, was that the move “could be prejudicial to the regulatory objective of protecting and promoting the interests of consumers”.

In a letter to Paul Philip, chief executive of the SRA, Chris Kenny, chief executive of the LSB, said there was a “clear policy need” to examine whether the appropriate balance was being struck between client protection and additional costs to the industry.

Mr Kenny welcomed the SRA’s decision earlier this month to announce a call for evidence on its indemnity reforms.

“The LSB considers that the SRA is right to examine all the options, rather than operating on the assumption that the current position is necessarily the right basis from which only incremental change may be needed.

“It should not be taken as read that the current arrangements are underpinned by a very strong evidence base, as opposed to simply being the result of custom and practice.

“In that respect we note the general absence of data in the submissions made to the LSB by other stakeholders, as well as in the application itself.”

Mr Kenny added that there was “limited evidence” that costs savings would be achieved and the potential impact on the Compensation Fund had not been fully explored.

He said that the LSB needed further evidence by 5 September this year, to determine the application by the end of that month.

Charles Plant, chairman of the SRA, said the regulator was “obviously disappointed” that the LSB had issued the warning notice.

“The immediate impact is that the changes we have proposed in relation to reductions in mandatory cover cannot now take effect in October this year,” he said.

“In principle, I think this is the wrong decision and we remain convinced of the case for changing the arrangements for professional indemnity insurance, in order to deliver benefits for solicitors and consumers alike. We will, therefore, continue to develop our proposals on this issue.”

 

Tags: , ,



Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

Disruptive innovation: the Christensen thesis hits law schools and legal services

Roger Smith

A report from the Christensen Institute for Disruptive Innovation warns that law schools in the US are “in crisis” and doomed unless they must respond positively to the “disruption of the traditional model for the provision of legal services”. The report relishes the coming of Armageddon by a sector whose financial viability it says will soon be choked off by the transformation of the legal market. How does this thesis stack up from the other side of the Atlantic?

February 28th, 2017