Solicitor jailed for role in £4.3m land-banking scam

Print This Post

3 June 2015

Land-banking: defendants sold plots they did not own

Land-banking: defendants sold plots they did not own

A solicitor has been jailed for five and a half years for his role in a £4.3m land-banking scam.

Dale Walker – who practised on his own account from Sevenoaks in Kent – was convicted of one count of possessing criminal property and one count of aiding and abetting the carrying on of a regulated activity, namely a collective investment scheme (CIS), without authorisation.

He was sentenced to five and a half years’ imprisonment for the first count and 21 months for the second, the sentences to run concurrently.

The jury was unable to reach a verdict over a charge of conspiracy to defraud. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), which brought the prosecution, decided not to seek a retrial and the count was ordered to lie on the file. Mr Walker has also been disqualified as a director and is facing confiscation proceedings.

The solicitor was one of eight men convicted of the fraud, which to date has led to sentences totalling 26 years’ immediate imprisonment.

Between July 2008 and November 2011, the group ran three companies – Plott Investments Ltd, which changed its name to Plott UK Ltd, European Property Investments (UK) Ltd, and Stirling Alexander Ltd.

Salesmen for the companies cold-called potential investors to sell them agricultural land that the companies had bought for minimal amounts, as well as land the companies did not own. Using sales scripts, misleading promotional material, and high-pressure sales techniques, they lied about the current and future value of the land.

People were persuaded to purchase land at a vastly inflated price, on the false promise of a substantial profit. The scheme extracted at least £4.3m from 110 investors and none of them have seen a return.

Mr Walker was the solicitor to the scheme and received nearly £900,000 of the proceeds of crime into his accounts. He was described by Judge Leonard QC in his sentencing remarks as having “deliberately frustrated and delayed the FCA’s investigations”.

The judge said that Mr Walker’s conduct was worse because he was a solicitor.

Judge Leonard said the scheme was “a subtle and cruel fraud because it involves the concept of owning land, a commodity that the public are bound to think has value and on which they cannot lose and on which they can easily be persuaded that they can make very substantial profits”.

Georgina Philippou, acting director of enforcement and market oversight at the FCA, said: “The FCA will take strong action, through both the civil and criminal courts, against those who operate illegal investment schemes and those who assist them like solicitors.

“People put their homes and retirements at risk on the back of promises of high returns that were never going to be realised. The severity of the sentences shows how seriously the courts view this kind of offending.”

The investigation, Operation Cotton, is one of the largest undertaken by the FCA to date and involved the use of the FCA’s civil powers against two of the companies through which the scheme operated. When the defendants continued with the scheme through a different company, the FCA brought an end to the scheme by taking criminal action.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority initially imposed conditions on Mr Walker’s practice in August 2012, including a requirement that “his instructions in any matters relating to land-banking or collective investment schemes are limited to the extent that he may not act for vendor or purchaser in individual sale or purchase transactions”. Then, in February 2014, the regulator shut the firm down.

His appearance before the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal has been delayed pending the outcome of the FCA’s action.

Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

The ethics of the SRA’s social media warning notice

Mena Ruparel

Social media portals are regularly used by firms and those who work for law firms in both professional and personal capacities. Their informal nature and the fast pace of use makes it all too easy for regulated people to get carried away with online discussions or comments which can fall foul of the regulator. This is more likely to happen on social media platforms as these are virtual, accessed in the solicitor’s own time and space. It can be easy to forget that solicitors are regulated just the same at 11pm on their home computer as they are at 3pm in the office or at court.

September 15th, 2017