Software suppliers association ends agreement with Free2Convey

Print This Post

22 April 2016

Julian Bryan

Bryan: “We felt it was time to move on”

The Legal Software Suppliers Association (LSSA) has ended its agreement with conveyancing portal Free2Convey, it has emerged.

Free2Convey was set up by the LSSA last autumn as a rival to the Law Society’s failed conveyancing portal Veyo. Its development has been led by former LSSA chair Matt Lancaster, the sales and marketing director at technology firm Pracctice.

Julian Bryan, new chair of the LSSA since last week’s AGM, said that instead of the umbrella agreement, individual members would from now on have “separate commercial arrangements” with the portal.

Mr Bryan, managing director of Quill Pinpoint, told Legal Futures: “The association has always been very supportive of Free2Convey, and it still is.

“It’s a stepping stone in its journey – almost like an incubation period. It is moving to the next stage in its evolution. It’s not a fall-out.

“We were keen to support the launch. As Free2Convey gathers momentum, we felt we should let them go in their own direction.”

Mr Bryan said that having invested “quite a bit of money” in Free2Convey, Pracctice would naturally be looking for “some sort of commercial return.” He suggested this could be through advertising, charging software firms for integration with case management systems or charging law firms support fees.

Mr Bryan went on: “Individual companies integrating with Free2Convey will carry on doing that. We felt it was time to move on. We have 19 members. Not every software supplier is dealing with conveyancing. We feel we’ve given Free2Convey a damn good leg-up.”

A formal statement from the LSSA said: “As the project has developed we found that the LSSA and Pracctice, who have undertaken the technical development of the Free2Convey project, did not share a commonality of vision for the future direction of the project.”

Mr Lancaster said in the statement: “We are grateful for the support from the LSSA members in promoting Free2Convey to the legal profession and other stakeholders. Pracctice is looking forward to progressing with the development and marketing of Free2Convey.”

The main features of Free2Convey are ‘chain view’, giving conveyancers a real-time overview of a conveyancing chain for the first time, and an online ‘deal room’, allowing the parties to upload and work on documents collaboratively. Both features were promised by Veyo.

Earlier this year Mr Lancaster said Free2Convey had evolved from being simply a “tool to make conveyancing easier” to becoming a “trusted community”, and had entered into a partnership with the Safe Move Scheme to add new anti-fraud tools and additional secure messaging.

Tags: , , ,

One Response to “Software suppliers association ends agreement with Free2Convey”

  1. Even when it came out Free2Convey always seemed to be a rather tired facsimile of other more polished products, not least the Veyo system, which some LLSA members seemed desperate to stop at all costs and which (if you believe the TLS line…..bless you if you do) they were successful in achieving. ‘Chain view’ (for the first time….really?) ‘Deal Room’ ‘trusted community’ – i’m sure I heard those phrases when Veyo was pitched. Mission accomplished, it seems that the shared purpose within the LSSA on this point has run out of steam. Every man for himself now the ‘evil’ that was Veyo is no more!

  2. Bob Ronson on April 22nd, 2016 at 3:52 pm

Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

Rating lawyers by their wins and losses – a good idea?

Robert Ambrogi

Lawyers will give you any number of reasons why their win-loss rates in court are not accurate reflections of their legal skills. Yet a growing number of companies are evaluating lawyers by this standard – compiling and analysing lawyers’ litigation track records to help consumers and businesses make more-informed hiring decisions. The shortcomings of evaluating lawyers by win rates are many. Not least of them is that so few cases ever make it to a win or loss. Of equal concern is that, in the nuances of law practice, it is not always obvious what constitutes a win or a loss.

February 22nd, 2017