The “social enterprise” ABS that reduced clients’ fee rates

Print This Post

13 September 2016

Baker: virtuous circle

Baker: virtuous circle

One of the first local authority alternative business structures (ABSs) is projected to increase its turnover 30% over the next year, and has already cut the fee rates for its shareholder clients by 20%, it revealed yesterday.

LGSS Law is now also providing legal advice and representation to more than 100 client organisations within the public and not-for-profit sectors, said Quentin Baker, its director of law, procurement and governance.

LGSS Law, which Mr Baker described as a “social enterprise law firm”, became an ABS in April 2015. It is made up of what was the joint legal services department of Northamptonshire and Cambridgeshire county councils, and merged in Central Bedfordshire council’s legal team a year later. Owned by the councils, it has 145 lawyers and staff in four offices, having recently opened new headquarters in Huntingdon.

Speaking at yesterday’s Westminster Legal Policy Forum, Mr Baker said that in its first year as an ABS, the firm had recorded a turnover of £6.5m, with a £100,000 profit. The 20% fee cut saved its two council owners a further £1.4m, he said. For everyone else, LGSS’s fees have not gone up in five years.

The savings came from greater efficiency through better managing the business, he said: “Some of it is economies of scale. It’s not difficult really.”

A further 30% increase in turnover is projected for 2016-17, with profits up to £500,000. Mr Baker said he was in active discussions with two other large teams that are looking to merge with LGSS, while he is advising other local authority legal teams that are looking to copy the model.

He said he was confident that in two or three years’ time, LGSS Law would hit the £10m turnover mark. “I feel we’ve tapped an unmet demand for these services – there’s a real gap in the market.”

He said being owned by its main clients created a “virtuous circle” – having reassured the Solicitors Regulation Authority about how LGSS maintained its independence – and as a company limited by shares, it was “infinitely adaptable to different types and sizes of partner organisation”.

As well as efficiencies, Mr Baker said the structure improved service levels – with a more effective business support team and IT systems – enabled income generation by allowing the firm to trade, and made it a more attractive place to work, thanks to more career opportunities, more specialist teams, and pay and benefits that were “better able to reflect the value of the input”.

This was in contrast to the restrictions of being part of a local authority, which have been hit by the dual impact of the government’s austerity agenda and an aging population requiring ever greater amounts spent on care.

Demand on legal departments was growing while resources were reducing, Mr Baker said, which was the main driver for setting up the ABS.

Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

The LSB’s proposals for legislative reform: let’s be clear

Caroline Wallace LSB

The publication of the Legal Services Board’s vision for legislative reform of legal services regulation on 12 September has generated a healthy level of interest and debate. This can, on the surface, seem a somewhat dry subject. However, it has an impact not just on existing regulated practitioners, but also on providers of legal services more generally, as well as everyone who uses or benefits from an effective legal sector. And, let’s face it, that’s all of us.

October 25th, 2016