Slater & Gordon “failed in due diligence” over Quindell purchase

Print This Post

23 March 2016

Tony Williams

Williams: a “very expensive grab for market share”

Slater & Gordon failed to carry out good enough due diligence checks before buying Quindell’s professional services division this time last year, a partner at the UK’s first listed law firm has suggested.

Following the £637m purchase of what is now Slater Gordon Solutions, S&G reassured shareholders that it had carried out “very extensive” due diligence.

However Andrew Evans, partner at Gateley plc, told the SRA Innovate conference yesterday: “I think they didn’t do their due diligence as well as they should have done”.

Mr Evans said S&G also got it wrong in “not seeing change coming down the line and therefore paying far too much for something, only to find that it’s not worth what you paid.

“And I think probably that they are very concentrated in PI. That had its upsides, but it also had its downsides it terms of backing one type of horse.”

Tony Williams, principal of law firm consultancy Jomati Consultants, said: “The big problem when a trailblazer gets into trouble, whether it’s Slater & Gordon or Parabis, is that people can say ‘everyone knew that ABSs wouldn’t work’. Law firms fail for different reasons.

“Once you have an unlimited supply of cash, the temptation to splash it can be also unlimited.”

Mr Williams said that instead of behaving like this, listed law firms should be particularly “mean” with their generous resources.

He said the personal injury market was going through “fundamental change” when S&G made its Quindell purchase.

“It was a grab for market share at a time when the market was going to be very challenged, which made it a very expensive grab for market share. I think it will encourage people to be cautious with certain things. I don’t think that’s necessarily bad news. You’re dealing with a very conservative profession and people who are innately conservative in their buying habits.

“To develop a retail brand, the level of advertising and investment is massive. If you look at Direct Line, that was a 10-year, probably billion pound programme of advertising and investment.”

Giles Murphy, head of professional services at accountants Smith Williamson, who acted for Russell Jones & Walker on the sale of the firm to S&G, said: “Wherever Slater & Gordon are now, it’s a fascinating journey they’ve been on and they’ve extended the boundaries of what is possible for a law firm in the UK. They’ve been a disruptive influence and we can all learn from what they’ve done.”

John Llewellyn-Lloyd, corporate finance director at stockbrokers Arden Partners, added: “You have to be very careful about regulatory change when it comes to making acquisitions and raising funding.

“There has been so much regulatory change in the personal injury market in the UK. Slater & Gordon’s structure and strategy never fully addressed that. The world of M&A is littered with people who do one too many large deals, and the rest is history.”

Slater & Gordon unveiled last month an eye-watering loss of £493m for the six months ending 31 December 2015, and announced restructuring plans.

Meanwhile, in other ABS news, Kent County Council has decided to go it alone in setting up an ABS, having previously looked for a law firm partner.

The ground-breaking local authority department Kent Legal Services (KLS) – which led the way in offering legal services to other public sector bodies and employs 125 lawyers – is to be spun off into an ABS owned by the council with the aim of returning “a significantly increased and sustainable income stream for the taxpayer”.

Geoff Wild, the council’s director of governance and law, said: “The company will be able to operate in the wider market without the regulatory restrictions imposed on in-house lawyers and an increase in use of technology and new business systems will lead to more efficient and better working.

“This new contract [with the council] and investment will significantly increase the contribution KLS can make to the funding of frontline services for the benefit of both our clients and the wider Kent community.”

Tags: , ,

Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

The LSB’s proposals for legislative reform: let’s be clear

Caroline Wallace LSB

The publication of the Legal Services Board’s vision for legislative reform of legal services regulation on 12 September has generated a healthy level of interest and debate. This can, on the surface, seem a somewhat dry subject. However, it has an impact not just on existing regulated practitioners, but also on providers of legal services more generally, as well as everyone who uses or benefits from an effective legal sector. And, let’s face it, that’s all of us.

October 25th, 2016