Second time lucky for top accountants after “hell” of dealing with SRA over ABS bid

Print This Post

29 April 2015

Snyder: major change of attitude

Snyder: major change of attitude

Sir Michael Snyder, senior partner of top 20 accountants Kingston Smith, has welcomed a change of approach to multi-disciplinary practices at the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) after describing the “sheer hell” of the firm’s first attempt to become an alternative business structure (ABS).

Sir Michael, co-chairman of the government’s Professional Business Services Council, said his firm should shortly be licensed as an ABS by the SRA after inappropriate rules and the “attitude of SRA staff” forced his firm to abandon its initial ABS application after 18 months.

He told yesterday’s Legal Futures Regulation and Compliance Conference that the attitude seemed to be that accountants were a “lower form of life”, unable to understand concepts such as conflicts of interest and confidentiality.

He said the regulator’s responses “became nasty” when, after a year, he “fought back” and complained to the Lord Chancellor and the Legal Services Board.

Sir Michael’s firm has since become the first to be regulated as an ABS by the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW).

He said there had now been a “major change of attitude” by the SRA, which had enabled Big Four accountants like EY to obtain licences as multi-disciplinary practices (MDPs).

“The SRA has recognised that its rules simply did not recognise MDPs. This is a result of learning through the application process, pressure from the LSB and government, and a change in culture at the top.”

He added that the SRA had acknowledged the need to move away from “one size fits all regulation” and the fact it was heading in the direction of more proportionate regulation was very welcome.

Sir Michael anticipated that, because of this new approach, his firm would “hopefully be the next” accountancy firm ABS to be approved as a MDP by the SRA.

He said the firm’s current ABS licence from the ICAEW enabled it to provide a “holistic suite” of probate services. However, legal services, such as preparing wills and applying for probate, only made up a “tiny proportion” of its offering to clients.

Even when the firm was licensed by the SRA, Sir Michael said the “limited” legal services it would offer, for example on M&As or HR issues, would be “incidental” to the firm’s wider work. “We have no intention of doing conveyancing, larger M&A, family or criminal work.”

He said that Kingston Smith would hand back its ICAEW ABS licence once this happens, but would not be drawn on whether the firm would return to the institute if and when it has the power to regulate all of the reserved legal activities, rather than just probate as now.

Tags: , , , ,

Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

Rethinking ‘quality versus quantity’

Andrew Lloyd 2017

The ‘quality versus quantity’ discussion has been prevalent in conveyancing firms for as long as I can remember. Sacrifice one to achieve the other is the common perception – but should we really see these elements as mutually exclusive? According to the Chancellor’s Autumn Statement, the UK lags behind the US and Germany by some 30 percentage points when it comes to productivity, meaning a German worker takes four days to produce what a British worker does in five.

February 15th, 2017