SDT strikes off convicted solicitor at third time of asking

Print This Post

15 April 2016


SDT: solicitor failed to heed warning

SDT: solicitor failed to heed warning

The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) has struck off a solicitor convicted of serious criminal offences after he was allowed to continue in practice following two previous appearances before the tribunal for accounts and practice rules breaches.

Conceding that a warning given on his second SDT appearance had been ineffective, the tribunal said that criminal offences subsequently committed by sole practitioner Dale Robert Walker were of a seriousness that he could not remain on the roll for “a moment longer”.

Mr Walker, who did not offer any mitigation, was sentenced at Southwark Crown Court in April 2015 by to 21 months’ imprisonment for aiding and abetting an unauthorised collective investment scheme and five and a half years’ imprisonment for money laundering, to run concurrently.

The tribunal recorded that the trial judge had noted the seriousness of a solicitor being involved in a nearly £900,000 money laundering offence. The fraud perpetrated was both “subtle and cruel”, and it had had a “dreadful impact” on its victims.

The tribunal regarded the criminal offences Mr Walker had committed as “at the higher end of the spectrum of seriousness”  and that his “actions had been cynical and utterly calculated”.

Compounding the seriousness of Walker’s conviction, the tribunal noted, was the fact that he had been before it on two previous occasions, with an escalation in the amount of fine he had been ordered to pay.

In April 2005 he was fined £10,000 plus £12,000 costs after being found guilty of conduct unbefitting a solicitor for Solicitors Accounts Rules and Solicitors Practice Rules breaches. In April 2009 he was found guilty of similar rule breaches, but accepting that he “had been reckless rather than dishonest in his method of charging”, the tribunal ordered that he pay a fine of £15,000 plus costs of £16,000.

The SDT recorded that: “He had been advised that a second appearance before the tribunal was an extremely serious matter. Clearly that warning had no effect upon him.”

Mr Walker was struck off the roll of solicitors and ordered to pay costs of £3,150.

Tags:



One Response to “SDT strikes off convicted solicitor at third time of asking”

  1. A year since Walker was imprisoned, and only now is he struck off. And this latest consideration by the SDT of Walker’s conduct was his third. What a farce. Is the SDT really fit for purpose??

  2. Geoffrey Negus on April 16th, 2016 at 8:39 pm

Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

Rating lawyers by their wins and losses – a good idea?

Robert Ambrogi

Lawyers will give you any number of reasons why their win-loss rates in court are not accurate reflections of their legal skills. Yet a growing number of companies are evaluating lawyers by this standard – compiling and analysing lawyers’ litigation track records to help consumers and businesses make more-informed hiring decisions. The shortcomings of evaluating lawyers by win rates are many. Not least of them is that so few cases ever make it to a win or loss. Of equal concern is that, in the nuances of law practice, it is not always obvious what constitutes a win or a loss.

February 22nd, 2017