Saga lampoons ‘jargony’ lawyers in first legal services TV adverts
By Legal Futures
13 February 2015
Advert: a nightmarish vision?
Over-50s company Saga has launched the first television advertising campaign for its legal services division, satirising the notion of lawyers being long-winded.
There are two adverts, one for will-writing and the other for probate services (see end of article to watch them), which envisage what life would be like if everyone spoke like a lawyer.
“Even something as simple as ordering a pint at your local would become a baffling ordeal,” Saga says.
The wills advert begins with a man outside a pub wishing his friend “Salubrious departure, Bri. Send my positive sentiments to your progeny”, after which actor Michael Fenton Stevens turns to the camera with the question: “Imagine if everyone spoke like a lawyer.”
The probate advert is set in a restaurant and starts with a cloakroom attendant asking a customer, “May I deposit your sleeved outer garment in our storage facility?”
The spots emphasise Saga’s proposition that it “likes to keep things straightforward”, especially with legal services, and cut through the jargon. It promotes Saga’s fixed-fee proposition and highlights the fact that people can call seven days a week.
The campaign, which also includes 10-second cut downs promoting Saga’s conveyancing services, is supported by radio spots.
Saga’s marketing director, Amanda Hoskins, said: “The campaign raises awareness of Saga shaking up the legal market, by offering a service which, amongst other things, is simple and straightforward. We have worked hard to make them clearer for our customers.”
David Boscawen, group MD of advertising agency VCCP, which was behind the campaign, added: “People find legal services complex and hard to understand but they do have an inherent trust in the Saga brand to deliver a great service at a fair price, and we wanted to reflect this.”
I recently sat on a panel debate in Manchester, with the debate entitled – ATE insurers and sub-£250k claims. Whilst the title of the debate was probably written ahead of the government’s consultation paper to introducing fixed recoverable costs in lower-value clinical negligence claims, where £25,000 rather than £250,000 is being recommended, it nevertheless raised an interesting point on how after-the-event insurers can make premiums proportionate to damages, especially for cases worth less than £25,000.