Revealed: Legal Ombudsman puts 10% of staff at risk of redundancy

Print This Post

25 July 2013


Legal Ombudsman: taking over CMC complaints – at some point
Photo: Elliott Brown

The Legal Ombudsman (LeO) has put around 10% of its staff at risk of redundancy as it undertakes a restructuring brought about by receiving fewer complaints than expected, Legal Futures can report.

The problem has been exacerbated by difficulties in making good on last year’s ministerial pledge to move the handling of complaints about claims management companies (CMCs) to LeO – which may now need primary legislation to resolve.

A LeO spokesman confirmed to this website that 25 roles have been put at risk of redundancy – its most recent annual report put the staff complement at 266.

He said: “The Legal Ombudsman has undertaken a re-structure to ensure it continues to provide an effective, customer-focused service that responds to its changing external environment.

Error, group does not exist! Check your syntax! (ID: 14)

“In our business plan this year we committed to achieving a high performance organisation that is effective and responsive. Since publishing our business plan we have seen fewer cases than expected through our doors – partly due to the economic climate and also due to improved performance by lawyers at the first tier.

“The re-structure is intended to ensure we continue to resolve complaints efficiently and cost-effectively. The changes will allow the ombudsman to meet its unit cost KPI, a key measure agreed with the Legal Services Board. The ombudsman is also about to release a discussion paper about its future remit.

“Ensuring a sound cost basis for the service will assist it in broadening its role in the future, for instance if it recommends to the Lord Chancellor to establish a voluntary scheme.

“There have been roles placed at risk of redundancy as a result of this re-structure. A process of consultation now follows.”

In the year to 31 March 2013, LeO resolved 7,630 cases. While this figure was similar to the total for the preceding year, it had planned for an uplift in workload. In fact, there was a decline of 5,000 in the number of people contacting the organisation, from around 76,000 in 2011-12 to just over 71,000 in 2012-13.

This contributed to LeO failing to meet its key performance indicator for the cost per case (calculated by dividing the £16.5m cost of LeO by the number of cases resolved). Against a target of £2,000, it achieved £2,168.

It had been hoped that the increased work brought about by handling complaints against CMCs would minimise the scale of the restructuring and also bring down the cost per case across its entire caseload to the benefit of all.

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) announced in August 2012 that LeO was to take over complaints-handling from the Claims Management Regulator (CMR), but an MoJ spokeswoman would only say yesterday: “We remain committed to bringing claims management complaints handling within the remit of the Legal Ombudsman and will do so as soon as possible.”

Legal Futures understands that the problem is Legal Services Board (LSB) concerns over whether it has the statutory power to collect a levy from the CMR in the same way as it does from the Law Society, Bar Council and other approved regulators to pay for LeO. The LSB argues that it does not have the resources to levy individual CMCs, and also that this would be inconsistent with how it otherwise operates.

An LSB spokesman said: “We are 100% behind the policy intent of the Legal Ombudsman to take on CMC complaints and we will do what we can to facilitate [it]. But at present there remains an issue to be fixed regarding funding mechanism which all parties keen to get this in place need to resolve.

“No movement towards the Legal Ombudsman taking on CMC complaints can happen until this has been resolved in a way that is satisfactory to all sides. We are in continued discussion with MoJ and OLC [the Office for Legal Complaints – LeO’s governing board] on this and hope it will be resolved.”

We understand that the MoJ is now considering whether primary legislation is required and how this would be achieved.

Tags: , , , ,



3 Responses to “Revealed: Legal Ombudsman puts 10% of staff at risk of redundancy”

  1. Believe me the road this coalition government is taking in respect of LASPO and Legal Aid reforms there will be thousands and thousands of more jobs losses in the legal industry.

  2. Richard W on July 25th, 2013 at 12:32 pm
  3. Interesting that there are many less complaints now despite the ever widening coverage of the scheme e.g. to people who aren’t clients.

    This might point to success in the move to outside handling, by the LeO away from the profession itself–the Complaints Bureau and other names.

    I’m sure more law firms take the handling of complaints much more seriously?

  4. Andrew Woolley on July 26th, 2013 at 3:14 pm
  5. I agree with Richard. Due to cuts to Legal Aid fewer people will be able to instruct lawyers. Same goes for changes to employment tribunals. Less clients = less complaints. Less complaints = more redundancies at the Legal Ombudsman. Also a lot of small firms are struggling to survive, and the £400 case fee imposed by the Legal Ombudsman can’t really hurt, especially if more than one person complains. I would be looking to get out now if I worked there.

  6. Sally French on September 7th, 2013 at 11:40 am

Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

The security of certainty

Michael Wildy Allianz

What are our considerations when looking to buy home or car cover? I would imagine price would certainly be amongst the considerations, but I’m confident that we would each weigh up whether or not our chosen insurer could meet any claims we might bring, and perhaps as importantly, whether they’d provide us with a hassle-free claims process were the worst to happen. Legal expenses insurance should be no different.

December 6th, 2016