Regulate lawyers by “competence not title”, chair of CILEx Regulation says

Print This Post

1 May 2015


Alan Kershaw

Kershaw: titles “not well understood outside the profession”

Alan Kershaw, chair of CILEx Regulation, has said lawyers should be regulated “by competence, not by title” and urged the different branches of the profession not to give up on common training.

Mr Kershaw, who leaves his post at the end of this month, said titles were “not very important” and “not well understood outside the profession”.

Addressing delegates at the Legal Futures Regulation and Compliance conference this week, Mr Kershaw called for what he described as “common stem” education and training for all lawyers.

“Attempts to unify arrangements for at least parts of legal training are foundering for the usual reasons, to an extent which was predictable.

“But I refuse to believe that it is impossible to identify some areas of what I call ‘common stem’ legal education – skills, knowledge and especially attitudes.”

However, Mr Kershaw said that as a minimum there needed to be agreement on the “portability” of training among the different branches of the profession, when the barriers between them were breaking down.

“It would allow for occasional false starts in education or changes in direction, and take away some of the guess work and insider knowledge that dogs a legal career.”

Mr Kershaw questioned why, in the training of lawyers, so little attention was paid to the challenges posed by new technology – the advantages and the risks.

“The benefits of Artificial Intelligence could be very significant for lawyers and the public, but those benefits will be lost if lawyers have limited understanding of what they’re dealing with.”

Mr Kershaw warned that the financial systems of the western world were brought down by “more and more complicated forms of financial instrument” which those who should have been overseeing the system either “knew nothing about or pretended they understood”.

Turning to comparison websites, Mr Kershaw said it was not “beyond the wits” of the legal profession to find a joint way forward.

“McKenzie Friends are here to stay,” he went on. “There are very different stories about how the rules for them are being applied. There is a crying need for guidance on this across the court system.”

The CILEx chair concluded by saying that a single regulator for legal services was “inevitable as the branches of the legal profession grow together”.

However, he added later in the session: “My problem is not with the idea of a single regulator but if it is imposed suddenly, raising expectations that cannot be fulfilled.”

Mr Kershaw will be replaced by diplomat Quintin Quayle, a former British ambassador to Thailand, on 1 June 2015.

 

Tags: , ,



Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

The rise of the multi-disciplinary lawyer: A challenge for legal education

Catrina Denvir

The legal profession has been on the receiving end of much hype regarding the impact of technology. Recent commentators purport that the aspiring lawyer must be a triple threat, possessing knowledge of the law, coding expertise, and in-depth knowledge of legal technology. Yet, focusing on legal technology risks overlooking the need for skills that transcend latest fads. Legal technology is a means by which to handle data: to organise it, record it, extract it, analyse it, predict from it and leverage it. Quantitative and statistical literacy – the ability to understand, apply, visualise and infer from data – underpins technological literacy and yet receives very little attention from those who encourage innovation in the legal curriculum.

May 26th, 2017