Quindell targets £1bn turnover as deafness cases rack up

Print This Post

13 October 2014


Terry: upper end of market expectations

Alternative business structure (ABS) Quindell plc has nearly 45,000 noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) cases on the go as it bids to hit the £1bn turnover mark, its latest trading update has revealed.

Overall the third quarter of 2014 saw the AIM-listed company’s personal injury business record sales of £177m – up from £92m in the same period last year – with a further £23m brought in by Quindell’s technology arm.

It said this increase was “primarily to strong organic and synergistic growth; businesses acquired in the last 12 months represented less than 10% of revenue”.

Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (EBIDTA) were £83m, equating to 42% of revenue.

Error, group does not exist! Check your syntax! (ID: 14)

Quindell’s share price has risen marginally on the results, having closed at 154.5p on Friday, a recovery since last month’s unexplained dip below 140p.

Quindell announced earlier this year that it was shifting its focus from road traffic claims to more remunerative NIHL matters, and it now has 44,500 live NIHL cases. The company said 75% of cases are rejected during the two-stage vetting process – an initial clinic and two separate hearing tests – while settlements are happening quicker and at higher levels than expected.

Investors have been concerned about Quindell’s cash flow because its accounts recognise the expected revenue from cases in advance of actually receiving the cash. The Q3 update said operating cash flow is “significantly ahead” of expectations, with legal services cash collection hitting £760,000 per day, up from £500,000 at the end of the second quarter.

The Quindell board said that it “continues to consider and pursue… all options available to it, including share buy backs, North American listing, disposal or demerger of assets or divisions and strategic and/or financial investments by third parties, in order to maximise shareholder value”.

Chairman Rob Terry said: “Taking in to consideration that volumes are subject to roll out, execution and industry claims frequencies, the Board is confident that the upper end of market expectations can be achieved for the full year for 2014 on revenues of between £750m and £800 million by repeating the same run rate performance delivered by the business in Q3 and taking into consideration seasonal fluctuations in Q4.

“It is clear that in due course, the opportunity to deliver a business with over a billion pounds of revenue, generating significant profits with associated positive cash flows, is within our grasp.”

Tags: ,



3 Responses to “Quindell targets £1bn turnover as deafness cases rack up”

  1. Positive cash flows within grasp but not there yet?

  2. Richard Moorhead on October 13th, 2014 at 5:18 pm
  3. Are not these sort of repeat, standardised claims,the type, our government should be paying out, on a standard compensation claim basis, like they did with the miners ?

    How much of all this profit, has been made on the back of commercial awareness, and cheap lawyers ?

    This, we our to assume, is the governments preferred model, for the once solicitor profession. .

  4. finola moss on October 17th, 2014 at 5:59 pm
  5. If you know anything about NIHL work and the sources of this work then you will know that a very high percentage of the accepted cases will never succeed and therefore never turn into cash

  6. Anon on October 20th, 2014 at 9:14 am

Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

Do not fear robot lawyers – fear robot clients

Pulat Yunusov

Tech is famous for its shorter and shorter hype cycles. Robot lawyers were all over the twitters only a few months ago and now people actually yell at you for even mentioning the thing. Of course, robot lawyers should not even have surfaced in the first place because no one is remotely close to building them. Lawyers should not fear for their livelihoods. But there is something that is much more important than robot lawyers. It’s robot clients. Or at least the proliferation of machines, automated transactions, and standardized processes where lawyers once controlled the terrain.

September 20th, 2016