Property management company becomes first multi-disciplinary ABS


Property management: demand for fixed-fee litigation service

A London property management company has become the first multi-disciplinary alternative business structure (ABS) after gaining its licence from the Solicitors Regulation Authority.

Crabtree Property Management is also the first company to use the ABS structure to enter the legal services market; the only other non-lawyer business currently with a licence is The Co-operative, which first started offering legal services in 2006.

It has set up Crabtree Law, run by its in-house lawyer James Naylor, to offer a fixed-fee property litigation service to its contacts and clients, as well as trying to attract new clients to the business.

Crabtree manages a variety of property and currently has over 17,000 individual units within its portfolio, mainly spread across London and the south of England. The majority of these are residential blocks of flats, but it also manages shops, offices and houses.

It also has four other companies within the group: Crabtree Property Investments; Crabtree Corporate Services, which offers on-site staff payroll facilities and specialist employment advice plus company secretarial and registered office services; Moretons Property Services, which provide sales, lettings and lettings management services in London; and Regents Property Consultants, which provides surveying and design, lease extension valuations, and project management among other services.

Mr Naylor, who has been with the company for a year and is a director of Crabtree Law, said the ABS structure gave him as an in-house lawyer the opportunity to act for clients other than his employer. It will be just him offering legal advice, which is why the service is focused on property litigation.

He said there was demand in the property world for a “good service at modest and more certain cost”.

The licence is effective from 1 September. Crabtree director Arti Parmar is the head of finance and administration.

 

Tags:




Blog


Why law firms are getting AI supervision wrong

The profession’s response to AI supervision failures misunderstands the nature of LLM output – there needs to be for a shift in the culture.


Beyond the PII premium – rethinking risk

Professional indemnity insurance renewal is often treated as an annual pricing exercise. But it is also a chance to show how effectively you identify, manage and mitigate risk.


The AI governance gap in law firms and why it matters now

A third of law firms are already using AI tools with no formal policy in place to govern how AI gets used, what data goes into it, or who’s accountable when something goes wrong.


Loading animation