Over 250 Quindell shareholders register for planned group action

Print This Post

19 December 2014


Colin Gibson

“A lot of people are feeling quite bitter about this”

More than 250 current and former shareholders in AIM-listed alternative business structure Quindell have already registered their interest in a potential group action, Liverpool law firm Camps has said.

Camps, operating through its consumer brand Your Legal Friend, said earlier this week that it is concerned that shareholders had suffered “significant investment losses” which may be directly attributable to “extremely misleading” statements by the company and its board.

From a peak of around 660p in early 2014, shares in Quindell were trading as low as 24p earlier this month. They closed last night at 32.5p.

Colin Gibson, chief operating officer of Your Legal Friend, said some shareholders had lost up to £100,000 on their investments. He said the smallest losses were around £2,000-£3,000, while losses of £5-£15,000 were more typical.

Mr Gibson told Legal Futures that some shareholders had asked not to be added to the list until a later stage, and he had held “one or two” discussions on involvement by institutional investors.

“The scale of the response is quite encouraging,” he said. “A lot of people are feeling quite bitter about this – understandably I think.”

Mr Gibson said shareholder group actions were still “relatively virgin territory” in the UK. He said shareholder actions against Tesco and RBS differed from the potential action against Quindell in that they involved a single representation by the company rather than a “number of different representations over a period of time”.

Mr Gibson said he expected Your Legal Friend to wait for publication of an independent review by PwC, commissioned by Quindell earlier this month, before taking any further steps – unless there was a “significant delay” in publication. He said the report was likely to come out in the first few weeks of next year.

“Things are moving quickly and it’s all come in quite a rush,” Mr Gibson said. “Quindell shares were the most actively traded on AIM for a long time.”

He estimated the number of shareholders affected by the fall in share prices as 10,000 or more, mostly private individuals based in the UK.

Mr Gibson added that conditional fees would be considered as a means of funding any group action.

On the Your Legal Friend website, shareholders are told that for claims to be successful, they must have suffered a “measurable loss” on their investment and based their decision “at least in part on statements or information published and approved by the Quindell board and its advisors”.

Tags: , , ,



Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

Rating lawyers by their wins and losses – a good idea?

Robert Ambrogi

Lawyers will give you any number of reasons why their win-loss rates in court are not accurate reflections of their legal skills. Yet a growing number of companies are evaluating lawyers by this standard – compiling and analysing lawyers’ litigation track records to help consumers and businesses make more-informed hiring decisions. The shortcomings of evaluating lawyers by win rates are many. Not least of them is that so few cases ever make it to a win or loss. Of equal concern is that, in the nuances of law practice, it is not always obvious what constitutes a win or a loss.

February 22nd, 2017