Our turn to say sorry: Legal Ombudsman apologises over ADR change of heart

Print This Post

1 September 2015


complaint

EU directive will extend time for complaints

The Legal Ombudsman (LeO) has apologised to solicitors for any inconvenience caused after it abandoned plans to become a certified alternative dispute resolution (ADR) body without a full consultation.

Certification under the regulations, which implement an EU directive, will double LeO’s deadline for complaints about solicitors from six months to twelve.

However, in an announcement last week, LeO said it had decided to withdraw its application to the Legal Services Board (LSB) for certification to enable a “fuller consultation” to take place.

Guidance made clear that if solicitors had taken the initiative and already changed their client letters to refer to the new 12-month deadline, they should “revert back to the existing time limit of six months” from the date of the final response letter to the complaint.

“We are sorry if this has inconvenienced you, and we will let you know in good time when the next changes are due to be implemented”.

LeO said in an announcement in March that the new arrangements would start from 9 July 2015.

In a further announcement at the beginning of July, LeO said it had applied to the LSB to become certified “on the basis that all necessary changes to its scheme rules will, subject to the necessary approvals, come into force within six months of the directive’s 9 July implementation date”.

In its announcement last week, the Legal Ombudsman said its board, the Office for Legal Complaints, had taken the view that it was “in the public interest” for it to become certified.

“The Office for Legal Complaints planned to carry out a consultation limited to implementation of the changes necessary to achieve compliance but has subsequently decided that a wider consultation is merited.

“The consultation will be launched on 7 September 2015 and will be open for eight weeks. The Office for Legal Complaints will consider representations and decide how to proceed at its meeting in the week commencing 7 December 2015.”

LeO said the directive aimed to ensure that all consumers in the EU had access to an ADR scheme to seek redress for problems with goods and services, and set common standards for ADR providers.

Tags: , , ,



Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

The skills shortage in law firms is the biggest threat to handling cybercrime

CLC Roundtable discussion at Malmaison Hotel, Charterhouse Square

The skills shortage in our businesses is the biggest threat to our industry when looking at cybercrime. Cybercriminals are not just after money but are looking for sensitive information too, so the legal services sector is an obvious target. In the last year we have had reports of around £7m of client money being lost to such crime. This is not an IT issue and it should not be left to the IT teams to sort out. It is a high-level responsibility and a board-level issue that must be taken seriously. We suspect that we will look back on 2016 and ask why we didn’t respond quicker.

March 21st, 2017