Only 4% of CMC complaints relate to personal injury work, LeO reveals

Print This Post

5 June 2015

Andrew Burford

Burford: “not here to be consumer champion”

Only 4% of complaints about claims management companies (CMCs) received by the Legal Ombudsman (LeO) relate to personal injury work, it has emerged.

LeO took over the job of complaints handling for the sector in January this year from the Claims Management Regulation Unit, based at the Ministry of Justice.

Ombudsman Andrew Burford said yesterday that LeO received 253 complaints in its first three months in the new role – far less than many observers expected.

During the period from 28 January 2015 to the end of April, he said 94% of complaints related to financial products, 4% to personal injury and the rest to other areas of the law, particularly employment.

Mr Burford, who heads LeO’s claims management department, said 79% of the financial product complaints were about PPI and 16% about missold mortgages.

He said the biggest source of complaints about CMCs of all kinds was the lack of clear and transparent fees, followed by delays and the failure to provide regular updates.

“It’s important to remember that we’re not here to be a consumer champion or to fight for the industry,” he told a Westminster Legal Policy Forum seminar. “We’re an independent complaints service.

“We’re not here to catch out CMCs, we’re here to help CMCs improve and we can only do that in partnership with them.”

Mr Burford said LeO had closed 146 cases in its first three months, more than half of them by informal resolution. In 50% of cases, it found that there was no poor service.

LeO asked CMCs to reduce their fees in 21% of cases, to provide a full refund in 9% of cases, and a full refund plus compensation in a further 11%.

Mr Burford said separate consumer research carried out by the Legal Ombudsman revealed that only 35% of CMC customers knew who to complain to.

When consumers were asked if they could rely on CMCs to always tell the truth, only 4% said yes – compared to a figure of 47% for lawyers.

However, 52% of consumers who used CMCs said they were satisfied by the service they received.

Mr Burford added that during the first three months, one CMC had decided to surrender its authorisation following a series of complaints, and cited the transfer of complaints to LeO as one of its reasons for pulling out.

As Legal Futures reported earlier this week, figures from the Claims Management Regulation Unit show that the number of personal injury claims management companies (CMCs) has fallen below 1,000.

Tags: , , ,

One Response to “Only 4% of CMC complaints relate to personal injury work, LeO reveals”

  1. Compelling evidence as to why we should leave the small claims limit at £1000 for personal injury. Viable claims are much more likely to be filtered properly through solicitors with a vested interest in success only and therefore clients expectations are much better managed. This is surely better for claimants AND defendants.

  2. Jeff Dawson on June 5th, 2015 at 3:18 pm

Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

The LSB’s proposals for legislative reform: let’s be clear

Caroline Wallace LSB

The publication of the Legal Services Board’s vision for legislative reform of legal services regulation on 12 September has generated a healthy level of interest and debate. This can, on the surface, seem a somewhat dry subject. However, it has an impact not just on existing regulated practitioners, but also on providers of legal services more generally, as well as everyone who uses or benefits from an effective legal sector. And, let’s face it, that’s all of us.

October 25th, 2016