No more getting your clerk to do it – BSB bids to improve barristers’ diversity reporting

Print This Post

4 February 2014


Bar: more than a third of barristers are women, but only 13% of QCs

The Bar Standards Board (BSB) is set to introduce a series of measures to improve diversity reporting among barristers after the vast majority refused to answer many of the questions posed about their backgrounds.

Though the BSB has robust figures in relation to the gender, race and age of barristers, fewer than 15% disclosed information about any disabilities, their religion or belief, sexual orientation, and caring responsibilities – and that represented a marked increase since barristers were last asked in 2012.

The BSB’s most recent main board meeting was told that it is likely the low disclosure rate was caused by “the ability to delegate responsibility for completing the monitoring form to clerks or practice managers, coupled with issues barristers faced in locating the monitoring form and submitting it”.

Among various changes being introduced this year to improve completion rates are that barristers will no longer be able to delegate responsibility for filling in the form, it will be more prominent on the BSB’s Barrister Connect portal, and the regulator will increase efforts to explain the benefits of completing the form.

From the data it has, the BSB will shortly publish aggregated diversity data about the Bar in line with the requirements laid down by the Legal Services Board.

It shows that 37% of practising barristers are women, although the figure for QCs collapses to 13%. In relation to ethnicity, 89.8% are white and 10.2% black or minority ethnic (BME). However, while 13.6% of pupils are from a BME background, only 5.3% of QCs are.

The low response rates mean that the figures for the other characteristics surveyed are not strong enough to draw “reliable statistical conclusions”, the board was told.

The findings the BSB has showed that half of the practising Bar considers themselves Christian, with 39% claiming no religion; 3% are gay men, 2% bisexual and 1.1% gay women; and 56% of practising barristers attended a state school, compared to 44% who went to fee-paying schools, figures that are 61/39 among pupils.

Yesterday it emerged that 21% of law firms have failed to meet the deadline for making their diversity disclosures to the Solicitors Regulation Authority.

Tags: ,



2 Responses to “No more getting your clerk to do it – BSB bids to improve barristers’ diversity reporting”

  1. Of course, rather than being due to ‘delegation,’ it could be that people choose not to reveal things to the BSB because they regard it as an utterly incompetent organisation that does nothing other than provide serial sine-curist, ‘Baroness’ Deech, with another opportunity for strutting on the stage of public life without actually achieving anything useful.
    I simply do not trust it or her to keep my personal data safe which is why I don’t disclose anything other than my name and professional address.

  2. Graeem Harrison on February 4th, 2014 at 1:10 pm
  3. I don’t believe that delegation had anything to do with it. The fact is that barristers are not required to provide such personal information about themselves (the questions even asked if we were gay), and the large majority choose not to do so.

  4. David on February 5th, 2014 at 12:07 pm

Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

Are you ready to defend your firm’s reputation in the event of a cyber-attack?

Jonathan Hemus

With cyber-crime making the headlines more and more frequently, it is becoming increasingly important that law firms of all sizes understand how to handle such a situation professionally and keep their reputation intact. Here are some steps any law firm can take to help ensure that a cyber-attack or data breach doesn’t cost them their client base.

December 9th, 2016