Newly listed Australian law firm plans to follow Slater & Gordon to UK

Print This Post

20 May 2013


Australia: issue of timing and acquisition is being debated, says Shine

The newest listed law firm in Australia – and the third biggest personal injury practice in the country – is eyeing up an acquisition in the UK, it has emerged.

The fast-growing Shine Lawyers listed last week and saw its share price instantly increase by a half, and is now looking to follow in the footsteps of Slater & Gordon.

Managing director Simon Morrison told The Australian newspaper: “We have been looking [at the UK] pretty closely for about a year and have looked at a number of firms – one in particular we are very close to at the moment. The issue of timing and acquisition is being debated around our board table.”

Shine began life in 1976 as a country practice in Queensland and through both organic growth and acquisition has since grown to over 600 people located across 40 offices throughout Australia. It has a formal alliance with internationally acclaimed environmental advocate Erin Brockovich.

Error, group does not exist! Check your syntax! (ID: 14)

It is the third law firm to list after Slater & Gordon and Integrated Legal Holdings, which both went public in 2007.

Mr Morrison told the newspaper that the fragmented nature of the UK personal injury market offered an opportunity for new entrants like Shine. He said the existence of claims management companies “has created a culture of dependency among British firms for incoming work” and as a result of the referral fee ban “British lawyers are going to have to re-learn how to communicate with their customers”.

Mr Morrison said that while listing had given both Shine and Slater & Gordon access to capital that was not available to traditional partnerships, the two had different strategies – while Slater & Gordon is moving into non-personal injury consumer work, Shine is remaining focused on litigation, albeit that it is moving into areas beyond personal injury.

Mr Morrison and executive director Stephen Roche, a former managing partner, were the main beneficiaries of the listing, and have 65% of the practice, which on listing had a market capitalisation of A$155m (£100m).

Its 2012 revenues were A$85m with net profit after tax of A$15m and earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation of A$24m. Revenues are projected to grow to $A102m this year and $A115m in 2014.

As with Slater & Gordon, the Shine prospectus made it clear to investors that the firm has a paramount duty to the court first, and then to its clients. “Those duties prevail over Shine’s duty to shareholders. There may be instances where Shine and its lawyers, in exercising their duties to the court or to the client (or both), act other than in the best interests of shareholders. An example is in settlement negotiations where Shine’s duty to its client would be favoured over any short-term cash flow or funding needs of Shine’s business.”

Slater & Gordon entered the UK last year by acquiring Russell Jones & Walker and earlier this month announced its intention to buy three more personal injury practices.



Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

Do not fear robot lawyers – fear robot clients

Pulat Yunusov

Tech is famous for its shorter and shorter hype cycles. Robot lawyers were all over the twitters only a few months ago and now people actually yell at you for even mentioning the thing. Of course, robot lawyers should not even have surfaced in the first place because no one is remotely close to building them. Lawyers should not fear for their livelihoods. But there is something that is much more important than robot lawyers. It’s robot clients. Or at least the proliferation of machines, automated transactions, and standardized processes where lawyers once controlled the terrain.

September 20th, 2016