New council ABS targets health sector as it looks to compete with private practice

Print This Post

2 April 2015


Quentin Baker

Baker: “no traditional partnership structure or expensive offices”

A new local authority alternative business structure is targeting the health sector as one of its main growth areas.

As first reported on Legal Futures, LGSS Law, the joint legal services department of Northamptonshire and Cambridgeshire county councils, became an ABS yesterday. LGSS is one of the biggest public sector shared services organisations in the country, with 1,300 staff.

Quentin Baker, director of legal services at LGSS, said changes to health services were producing a “huge demand” for legal advice.

“There has traditionally not been a lot of in-house legal support in the health sector,” Mr Baker said. “They’re totally reliant on commercial law firms and that can be very expensive.”

Mr Baker said that among LGSS Law’s 80 external clients was Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Clinical Commissioning Group, responsible for over 100 GP surgeries.

He said LGSS Law had recently won a tender for another regional health service provider, along with specialist law firms Hempsons and Capsticks.

“We have no traditional partnership structure or expensive offices,” Mr Baker said. “Our fees are very, very competitive compared with specialist private sector law firms.

“We solely work for the public sector and not-for-profit bodies, and this is burnt into our culture. We’ve no intention of doing people’s divorces or anything like that.”

Along with health, Mr Baker said LGSS Law would target housing associations and other social landlords, which often had small legal teams, and the charity sector.

“We would very much like to work with charities active in our communities,” he said. “This fits in with the other clients we work with.”

As an example he gave the Arthur Rank Hospice Charity, which is planning to build a new hospice, and where LGSS Law beat off competition from private sector law firms.

Mr Baker said the ABS’s other clients included both district councils, such as Huntingdonshire, and parish councils. “District councils often do not have the critical mass you need to provide full service. We can provide these services much, much more efficiently.

“With austerity and pressure on taxpayer-funded services, we can provide a good and sensible way of making the money go further.”

Mr Baker said LGSS Law’s two main clients would remain Cambridgeshire and Northamptonshire county councils, with their combined spending power of £1.7bn.

He said that since the two councils set up LGSS in 2010, annual expenditure on legal advice from external law firms had fallen from “millions of pounds to almost nothing”.

Mr Baker said the councils would be benefit from economies of scale as the ABS expanded. “We’re very business-like and customer-focused, but we’re not commercial in the sense of being driven by a profit motive,” he said.

Mr Baker added that LGSS Law had increased the volume of its external legal work by almost three times in the last four years.

In a separate development, think tank Localis described legal services as a likely “future boom area” for local authorities.

Localis said in a report that one in four councils (24%) were currently generating external income from legal services, while a further 43% were considering the move.

Tags: , , ,



Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

The skills shortage in law firms is the biggest threat to handling cybercrime

CLC Roundtable discussion at Malmaison Hotel, Charterhouse Square

The skills shortage in our businesses is the biggest threat to our industry when looking at cybercrime. Cybercriminals are not just after money but are looking for sensitive information too, so the legal services sector is an obvious target. In the last year we have had reports of around £7m of client money being lost to such crime. This is not an IT issue and it should not be left to the IT teams to sort out. It is a high-level responsibility and a board-level issue that must be taken seriously. We suspect that we will look back on 2016 and ask why we didn’t respond quicker.

March 21st, 2017