Nearly half of law firms secured cheaper indemnity cover, survey suggests

Print This Post

17 October 2014


Nigel Wallis

Wallis: commentators say market “awash with capital”

Nearly half of law firms – 47% – secured cheaper indemnity insurance this year, a survey has suggested. Half of these obtained “significant” reductions.

The survey of managing partners by Liverpool-based advisory law firm O’Connors also indicated a move by firms from unrated to rated insurers, with 11% saying they had managed this.

In a further positive sign, 11% of firms said they had secured indemnity cover for the next 18 months, with a further 10% opting for a range of periods from 15 to 24 months.

The vast majority of law firms currently insure on the traditional annual basis, with, according to the survey, only 7% not having to renew in October.

Error, group does not exist! Check your syntax! (ID: 14)

Nigel Wallis, partner at O’Connors, said none of the firms in the survey complained that they had been unable to secure acceptable renewal terms.

Mr Wallis said 29% saw a slight increase in premiums, with 10% suffering a “large hike”, but the increases were blamed on “higher turnover and staff numbers, rather than a hardening market which commentators say remains awash with capital”.

He said respondents reported moving from unrated insurers to A-rated insurers at the same premium, which “must be a satisfying outcome”.

The level of premiums paid, according to the survey, ranged from just below 1% of turnover to just over 10% of turnover, with the highest number of firms, 54%, paying between 1% and 2%.

The vast majority of firms, 92%, purchased the same amount of indemnity cover as last year with just 5% increasing it. Just under a third, 64%, renewed with the same insurer.

Asked if they would have reduced their cover given the chance to £500,000, the figure put forward by the Solicitors Regulation Authority in its indemnity reform plans, only 13% said yes.

All the managing partners in the survey said they used a broker. Willis advised the biggest proportion of firms (17.5%), closely followed by Aon, Marsh, Lockton and Towergate.

“Things seem a little calmer this renewal season and it will be interesting to see how many firms have to take advantage of the extended indemnity period compared to last year”, Mr Wallis said.

“The cost of run-off cover remains a concern for many, with 92% of respondents believing it to be a ‘barrier to exit’ from the industry. One poor soul said his whole family desperately wants him to retire but he can’t afford the run-off premiums.”

High-profile failures of unrated indemnity insurers such as Balva appear to have left only three in the market – Alpha Insurance, based in Denmark, Elite Insurance, based in Grantham, and Enterprise Insurance Company, based in Gibraltar.

Tags: , ,



One Response to “Nearly half of law firms secured cheaper indemnity cover, survey suggests”

  1. All very jolly, but a cartel that is well worthy of the same attention that the legal profession has received in the last decade. The cost of PII and Run Off is an utter and total disgrace.

  2. Sat on the Sidelines on October 17th, 2014 at 10:54 am

Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

Know your client checks – A lesson from BHS

Paul-Bennett for Legal Futures

As you will be aware, it is a legal requirement for advisory firms to carry out ‘know your client’ checks. The purpose of doing so is to confirm your client’s identity and to seek to provide protection in respect of anti-money laundering (AML) and terrorist financing laws. The BHS experience before the House of Commons’ work and pensions committee and business, innovation and skills committee shows that firms need to think beyond AML obligations.

September 29th, 2016