National v local brands – stalwart QS firm “reclaims independence”

Print This Post

10 February 2015


Rebrand: the Clapham & Collinge team

Rebrand: the Clapham & Collinge team

The debate over national versus local legal brands is set to begin again after Norfolk firm Clapham & Collinge announced it was “reclaiming its independence” by leaving the QualitySolicitors network after four years.

The firm, which has offices in Norwich and Sheringham and employs more than 50 people, offers a typical range of private client and business services. “An elegant plum and pistachio brand-mark… has replaced the bright pink QualitySolicitors logo,” it said.

Senior partner Hugh Berridge said: “Becoming part of a large, national network was absolutely the right decision for us four years ago. At that time changes in legislation were making it incredibly hard for smaller law firms to compete against commodity legal providers such as the large supermarket chains. We were determined to put ourselves in the best possible position to retain our market share and grow as a business.

“There was a good fit between Clapham & Collinge and QualitySolicitors and we were able to learn from each other and create a customer-focused brand that is now well-known across the UK.

“We have enjoyed, and benefited from, being part of QualitySolicitors but, after a great deal of deliberation, the Clapham & Collinge partners decided that the time was right to start re-focusing on our own brand. We have always been incredibly proud to be a Norfolk firm and, as we develop the business, the county is where our commitment lays.”

QualitySolicitors showcased Clapham & Collinge at its member firm conference in 2013 to highlight its work in the local community. As well as supporting charities such as Break, Will-Aid and the Norfolk Wildlife Trust, the firm promotes its own events such as regular free advice coffee mornings, dementia awareness events and training sessions.

Mr Berridge added: “The move away from being part of a national network means that we can revert to making business decisions that are entirely focused on the needs of our business, our clients and our community.”



One Response to “National v local brands – stalwart QS firm “reclaims independence””

  1. We always stress the fact that for most firms outside the metrop, the large majority of their income usually comes from within 20 miles of their front door.

    You can grow your practice massively without having to market to the planet. Your local contacts and clients can provide enough new work to grow your practice 20% of 2 or 3 years on the bounce if you do nothing else at all, provided you leverage the value of the relationships adequately.

    None of this is rocket science. Building local influence/presence is cheap and easy to do, and you can automate much of the process.

    In the context of what can be delivered using technology, brand groups that don’t make extensive use of tech to better their members’ businesses look increasingly like an anachronism.

  2. Joe Reevy on February 11th, 2015 at 9:52 am

Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

Rating lawyers by their wins and losses – a good idea?

Robert Ambrogi

Lawyers will give you any number of reasons why their win-loss rates in court are not accurate reflections of their legal skills. Yet a growing number of companies are evaluating lawyers by this standard – compiling and analysing lawyers’ litigation track records to help consumers and businesses make more-informed hiring decisions. The shortcomings of evaluating lawyers by win rates are many. Not least of them is that so few cases ever make it to a win or loss. Of equal concern is that, in the nuances of law practice, it is not always obvious what constitutes a win or a loss.

February 22nd, 2017