Market, not SRA, will intervene if big firm hits the rocks, says Philip

Print This Post

10 March 2016


Philip: unanimous view

Philip: unanimous view

In the event a large firm collapses, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) expects the market to “gobble” up the pieces rather than leave it to the regulator to sort out, it has emerged.

Speaking to reporters after yesterday’s SRA board meeting, chief executive Paul Philip said the question of whether the regulator could cope with a large firm going down had been discussed internally.

The “unanimous” view was that “the market will gobble up all the work in an instant”, he said.

While there would be no impact on clients in such a scenario, it would however damage the international standing of the profession.

Pre-pack sales of law firms have attracted controversy because of the position unsecured creditors are left in as a result, but Mr Philip said this was a matter for the government.

The recent travails at Slater & Gordon have raised once more the question of a big firm collapsing, but the SRA has not commented on this beyond saying: “Slater & Gordon is part of our regulatory management programme and we are in contact with the firm on a very regular basis. As a regulator, any of our discussions with a firm are focused on protecting the interests of clients.”

Citing this blog by Legal Futures editor Neil Rose, Mr Philip added that he did not believe recent events at Slater & Gordon or Parabis highlighted any weaknesses in the alternative business structure concept; rather they were down to the firms’ business models.

He also suggested that it was time to stop using the term ‘alternative business structure’ as new forms of ownership were now mainstream.

In an earlier version of this story, we wrongly indicated that Mr Philip was referring to a particular firm when making these comments. We apologise for the misunderstanding.



Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

Rating lawyers by their wins and losses – a good idea?

Robert Ambrogi

Lawyers will give you any number of reasons why their win-loss rates in court are not accurate reflections of their legal skills. Yet a growing number of companies are evaluating lawyers by this standard – compiling and analysing lawyers’ litigation track records to help consumers and businesses make more-informed hiring decisions. The shortcomings of evaluating lawyers by win rates are many. Not least of them is that so few cases ever make it to a win or loss. Of equal concern is that, in the nuances of law practice, it is not always obvious what constitutes a win or a loss.

February 22nd, 2017