Litigation funder eyes ABS as way to finance law firms’ contingency fee work

Print This Post

25 October 2012


Carron: DBAs mean firms have shortage of working capital

A litigation funder with £40m a year to invest is considering using alternative business structures (ABSs) to make funds available to law firms, according to its chief executive.

Speaking at the Law Society’s civil justice section conference last week, Brett Carron, the chief executive and co-founder of Harbour Litigation Funding, said Harbour would consider funding arrangements with firms willing to work under damages-based agreements (DBAs, formerly known as contingency fees), which are due to be introduced next April.

One option would be for a firm to set up an ABS structure including funding vehicles for their firms, or departments within their firms, said Mr Carron. “From our point of view we would certainly look at those kind of arrangements, where we were comfortable with the lawyers working on those kinds of cases… so we would effectively become an ABS funder for that particular group within that particular firm.”

He emphasised that Harbour was not interested in becoming an ABS provider or a source of capital for the firm. “We’re really focused on litigation rather than on financing law firms generally,” he said.

The firms would have to be interested in doing DBAs, said Mr Carron. “Part of the issue with DBAs is that from a law firm’s point of view you have a shortage of working capital – you have all the [work in progress] tied up, you’re not able to bill for it. You hope the case will be successful but you don’t know if it will, so for some firms it puts enormous pressure on them – it limits their ability to do these kind of things.”

 

Tags: , , , ,



One Response to “Litigation funder eyes ABS as way to finance law firms’ contingency fee work”

  1. Interesting tactic in the use of ABS structures here, it looks as if the legal industry in already taking more entrepreneurial steps in response to turbulent times. I’ll be keeping a close eye on how this develops.

  2. Kerry Quinn on October 25th, 2012 at 3:32 pm

Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

Disruptive innovation: the Christensen thesis hits law schools and legal services

Roger Smith

A report from the Christensen Institute for Disruptive Innovation warns that law schools in the US are “in crisis” and doomed unless they must respond positively to the “disruption of the traditional model for the provision of legal services”. The report relishes the coming of Armageddon by a sector whose financial viability it says will soon be choked off by the transformation of the legal market. How does this thesis stack up from the other side of the Atlantic?

February 28th, 2017