Litigation finance company opens its ABS for business

Print This Post

6 October 2016


Evans: extensive multi-jurisdictional experience

Evans: extensive multi-jurisdictional experience

AIM-listed litigation finance company Burford Capital has finally activated its alternative business structure (ABS) after hiring a solicitor to act in judgment enforcement matters.

Burford Law was licensed by the Solicitors Regulation Authority in January 2016 but will now start operating after the company hired litigator Tom Evans as its head. He was previously been of counsel at US firm Akin Gump.

Burford – the world’s largest listed litigation funding business – entered the asset tracing and judgment enforcement market a year earlier by acquired Focus Intelligence.

Burford Capital chief executive Christopher Bogart said: “Tom has extensive multi-jurisdictional experience and will act as a solicitor in judgment enforcement matters, working closely with Burford’s busy and growing judgment enforcement team.”

He explained that Mr Evans was available to clients needing financing or enforcement services from Burford, and other services, to act as their solicitor in English matters, and to assist as a legal adviser when other jurisdictions were involved.

Mr Bogart said: “Moreover, Burford Law will offer its services on either a cash-pay or full conditional fee agreement basis to clients, at their option. We’re confident that Tom’s capacity to work in conjunction with Buford enforcement specialists and international local counsel will make for a faster, more seamless and generally happier outcome for clients.”

However, this might only be the start of what the ABS will do. Its annual report earlier this year said: “Through this vehicle, Burford can both operate its own law firm and take equity interests in other law firms. This is an early step for Burford to expand the ways in which it can provide capital to law firms and the benefits of external capital to clients.”

The report explained how Burford was evolving in line with the legal market’s changing attitude towards outside capital. From having originally just funded individual cases, only 13% of its new investments in 2015 were single matters, with the rest “a variety of other forms of capital provision to the legal market”.

“This transmutation is very significant, as it expands our potential market dramatically while enabling us to reduce volatility and retain our historical return profile,” it said.

This included providing $100m in capital for an unnamed global law firm, in its largest transaction ever.



Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

Rating lawyers by their wins and losses – a good idea?

Robert Ambrogi

Lawyers will give you any number of reasons why their win-loss rates in court are not accurate reflections of their legal skills. Yet a growing number of companies are evaluating lawyers by this standard – compiling and analysing lawyers’ litigation track records to help consumers and businesses make more-informed hiring decisions. The shortcomings of evaluating lawyers by win rates are many. Not least of them is that so few cases ever make it to a win or loss. Of equal concern is that, in the nuances of law practice, it is not always obvious what constitutes a win or a loss.

February 22nd, 2017