Licensed conveyancers attack regulator’s move into litigation and advocacy

Print This Post

2 November 2012


Mulroy: positive step

Licensed conveyancers have spoken out against their regulatory body’s bid to expand its regulatory reach to litigation and advocacy services.

However, a survey of its members by the Society of Licensed Conveyancers (SLC) showed strong support for the Council for Licensed Conveyancers (CLC) looking to regulate will-writing and estate administration should they become reserved legal activities.

In April the Legal Services Board rejected the CLC’s application to regulate litigation and advocacy, but left the door open to a future application, which the CLC is planning. Nearly two-thirds (64%) of the 68 respondents to the SLC survey opposed this, while 76% said they did not believe that the income generated by their practising fees should be used to fund it.

However, 87% of respondents supported an expansion into will-writing and estate administration; the CLC can already authorise practitioners to undertake probate work.

Error, group does not exist! Check your syntax! (ID: 14)

SLC chairman Simon Law said: “We took the decision to conduct our own survey as it had become clear that a number of our members were not wholly in support of the CLC’s plans to expand its regulatory role. The CLC has been pushing hard to secure approval from the Legal Services Board to expand into areas such as litigation and advocacy. However, it appears there is little support from the licensed conveyancer community for it to actually achieve this – which leads us to question where the impetus for moving into these areas is coming from.

“The CLC’s income is derived from regulating licensed conveyancers, yet the findings from our survey clearly indicate that the majority are not happy to be funding expansion into areas which they do not feel the CLC should be venturing into. This is something that needs to be addressed.”

In a statement, the CLC said it “remains committed to specialising in what it does best: conveyancing, probate and those other ‘consumer’ legal services that people use on a relatively regular basis. The application to regulate litigation and advocacy has not changed that: rather, we want our existing licence holders to have the opportunity to broaden their skill sets and to work within those specialist areas.

“With the introduction of alternative business structures (ABS) we have recently licensed a number of large organisations in the areas of conveyancing and probate, many of whom offer a range of other legal and property services.

June Mulroy, interim chief executive of the CLC, said: “As an innovative and independent regulator we are looking to the future and need to be responsive to the changes that are taking place in the legal services market and the opportunities that they present. It would be remiss of us as an organisation not to assess those opportunities to see if we can bring our expertise as a regulator to bear in other specialist areas.

“We see this as a positive step that in the longer term will benefit our regulated community as a whole as they would be able to extend their scope and range of regulated services to the public.”

 



Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

Know your client checks – A lesson from BHS

Paul-Bennett for Legal Futures

As you will be aware, it is a legal requirement for advisory firms to carry out ‘know your client’ checks. The purpose of doing so is to confirm your client’s identity and to seek to provide protection in respect of anti-money laundering (AML) and terrorist financing laws. The BHS experience before the House of Commons’ work and pensions committee and business, innovation and skills committee shows that firms need to think beyond AML obligations.

September 29th, 2016