Legal market poised for “second wave” of external investment

Print This Post

By Legal Futures

12 September 2016


Llewellyn-Lloyd: mixed experience to date

Llewellyn-Lloyd: mixed experience to date

The legal market is set for a “second wave” of external investment, a leading corporate financier said today, describing it as “an inevitable snowball that is gathering pace”.

Speaking at today’s Westminster Legal Policy Forum event in London, John Llewellyn-Lloyd, corporate finance director at Arden Partners, identified several markets – from criminal law to large commercial firms – where there were opportunities for investors.

With around half a billion pounds of private equity now invested in the legal market, representing around 20 individual deals, Mr Llewellyn-Lloyd said the experience to date had been mixed – while Parabis failed, Keoghs was “a success”.

He added that “investors are not expecting absolute victory”, and knew that risk came with reward.

In terms of public equity, Gateley had done very well, while in Australia, investors in listed specialist intellectual property firms had seen “spectacular returns”, he reported. But equally Australian-listed Slater & Gordon had experienced well-publicised problems.

Mr Llewellyn-Lloyd predicted that Brexit would increase the “fear factor” among law firms, “which makes it more likely that they’ll look to do things. They would quite like the backing of an investors or someone with deeper pockets”.

Looking at the market, he said there were “far too many firms” in what he described as the “crowded middle” of practices with turnovers ranging from £5m to £200m. There were significant opportunities to consolidate this part of the market, delivering “massive economies of scale” – this was more likely to be in the back, rather than front, office. “Investors see it as really interesting,” he said.

The financier said regulatory uncertainty had stalled investment in the personal injury market, but he predicted that if this was settled next year, as the government intended, “you’ll see a lot more activity in that area”.

Criminal law was a “very interesting opportunity” as well, he said. Speaking afterwards to Legal Futures, he said this too was a potential area for consolidation as it currently operated “very inefficiently”, with many firms unable to reduce their costs enough to match falling legal aid rates. It was ripe for “a new business model”.

He also foresaw a lot of accountants entering the legal market, eyeing up the cross-selling opportunities.



Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

Algorithms and the law

Jeremy Barnett

Our aim is to start a discussion in the legal profession on the legal impact of algorithms on firms, software developers, insurers, and lawyers. In a longer paper, we consider whether algorithms should have a legal personality, an issue which will likely provoke an intense debate between those who believe in regulation and those who believe that ‘code is law’. In law, companies have the rights and obligations of a person. Algorithms are rapidly emerging as artificial persons: a legal entity that is not a human being but for certain purposes is legally considered to be a natural person. Intelligent algorithms will increasingly require formal training, testing, verification, certification, regulation, insurance, and status in law.

August 22nd, 2017