Legal IT entrepreneurs tempt law students onto alternative career path

Print This Post

22 February 2016


Vestbirk: mapping lawtech scene will help showcase UK activity

Vestbirk: mapping lawtech scene will help showcase UK activity

Tech-savvy law students were last week invited to pursue careers delivering legal services via technology businesses instead of the conventional route of joining a legal firm, at a meeting of IT executives committed to establishing London as a global hub for lawtech start-ups.

The issue was among themes discussed at the third monthly meeting of the lawtech working group of Tech London Advocates (TLA) – a network of more than 2,500 senior IT specialists who “champion, connect and support London’s technology sector”.

Working group founder Jimmy Vestbirk, whose website Legal Geek has organised next month’s legal ‘hackathon’ event in aid of Hackney Law Centre, said the meeting in part aimed to “help students get more involved in law tech as an alternative route to market”.

He continued: “We think there are different routes to becoming a lawyer now… It’s looking at alternative delivery of legal services that can be done through technology and start-ups rather than purely going into a law firm, working your socks off, and maybe getting somewhere, maybe not.”

Another theme of the evening meeting at the offices of Chancery Lane solicitors, Lewis Silkin, was an attempt to ‘map the ecosystem’ of lawtech start-up activity in the capital. “A map of the ecosystem will hopefully become a point of reference to showcase the UK and what’s going on,” said Mr Vestbirk.

The working group is one of a number of TLA’s sub-groups, and aims to put corporate IT executives in touch with grass roots lawtech start-ups and promote London as a focal point for legal IT entrepreneurs. Its formal objectives, agreed in December, are headed with the statement “Lawtech uses technology to reinvent, disrupt and improve legal services”.

Attendees last week included representatives from LexisNexis, Thomson Reuters, Ofcom and LawBite.

The next meeting of the working group will be a forum “to discuss how start-ups can better engage with law students through formal internships and ad hoc work”.

Last week’s meeting was also given a presentation by the Cambridge-based start-up that produces software which the working group hopes to use itself to communicate. Pekama, whose strapline is “the online ecosystem for lawyers”, is a “cloud-based lawyer-client collaboration platform” that made news in December after receiving investment from local law firm Taylor Vinters.

Co-founded by Zeev Fisher, a dual-qualified Israeli lawyer and English solicitor, Pekama relies on automation and “legal data robotics [to] connect everything – lawyers and clients, emails and documents, tasks and deadlines”.

The TLA lawtech working group’s objectives are:

  • Showcase lawtech to the legal and digital communities, entrepreneurs and investors;
  • Educate the next generation of legal entrepreneurs in lawtech;
  • Promote London’s resources to become a global hub for lawtech start-ups; and
  • Leverage success stories to create a movement which, where appropriate, engages with government and professional bodies.

Tags: , ,



One Response to “Legal IT entrepreneurs tempt law students onto alternative career path”

  1. Sounds interesting! How do you become a member? What are the terms and conditions for the same.
    I’m a law student in Spain (multilingual), so how does it work? Please do let know…

  2. Rita G.K. on May 16th, 2016 at 10:02 am

Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

Rating lawyers by their wins and losses – a good idea?

Robert Ambrogi

Lawyers will give you any number of reasons why their win-loss rates in court are not accurate reflections of their legal skills. Yet a growing number of companies are evaluating lawyers by this standard – compiling and analysing lawyers’ litigation track records to help consumers and businesses make more-informed hiring decisions. The shortcomings of evaluating lawyers by win rates are many. Not least of them is that so few cases ever make it to a win or loss. Of equal concern is that, in the nuances of law practice, it is not always obvious what constitutes a win or a loss.

February 22nd, 2017