Law Society tight-lipped over reports of plan to launch own PII scheme for solicitors

Print This Post

By Legal Futures

2 July 2013


Hudson: not satisfied with scale of commission payments to brokers

The Law Society has refused to comment on speculation that it is to launch its own professional indemnity insurance offering for law firms.

Legal Futures understands that it has been examining a managing general agency model, through which it would offer cover underwritten by one or more insurers. It would be run by a broker, and the Law Society is believed to have run a tender with five leading names in the market.

A managing general agency owes its duties to the insurers, whereas brokers owe their duties to their clients.

Insurance Times has reported that it will be targeted at firms of one to four partners as part of the society’s work to dissuade firms from choosing unrated insurers.

Last week Law Society chief executive Des Hudson e-mailed firms of that size about the rating issue and also said Chancery Lane was increasingly concerned at the level of commission paid to brokers operating in this market segment.

He wrote: “We are not satisfied that the scale of the commission payments represents value for money for solicitor firms purchasing PII cover through such arrangements. The society is therefore actively considering practical ways in which we can assist our members in this market segment with a view to increasing the available options for purchasing rated cover, and to do so on terms that represent good value for money.”

One senior figure who has seen the plans told Legal Futures that the society is looking at not charging commission in a bid to reduce premiums, although he questioned how this would work given that the broker running the scheme would still need to be incentivised.

A leading broker, who also preferred to remain anonymous, speculated that the offering must involve bringing new rated capacity into the market, as otherwise existing insurers would simply be competing with themselves.

Specialists contacted by this website suggested that any insurance scheme put together by the Law Society risked becoming a version of the soon-to-be-abolished assigned risks pool, with only those firms unable to find cover from a rated insurer choosing to use it.

There were also questions about timing – with renewal only three months away, some firms have already begun the process – and whether having its own insurance scheme would make the society able to provide solicitors with independent advice on insurance, and also less effective when lobbying the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) over indemnity issues.

Last week the SRA announced that it would revisit the issue of whether to allow unrated insurers to write solicitors’ business.

Tags: ,



Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

Joint (ad)ventures in the legal sector

Nigel Wallis lo res

We all know that nothing in life is certain. As the actor, director and philosopher Clint Eastwood once said: “If you want a guarantee, buy a toaster.” He also said he’d tried being reasonable and didn’t like it. They should teach this kind of philosophy in law school. One thing in life is reasonably certain though. If you’re a law firm worth your salt, at some point you will be approached by another entity (most probably a work introducer) with a whizzy idea to ‘partner’ with you to ‘help you accelerate your growth’. In commercial speak this means, ‘we’d like to keep feeding you work but we’d also like to share in your profits’. The arrangement may be pitched to you as a joint venture – a win-win no less.

March 27th, 2017