Headache for 1,000 firms with SRA poised to pull out of consumer credit work

Print This Post

14 October 2014


SRA

SRA: FCA rules do not fit into its regime

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has said it may have to stop regulating consumer credit work, such as debt collection, from next April.

The regulator said it was aware that around 1,100 firms were involved in debt collection, while other consumer credit work included negotiating terms with creditors for settlement of divorce debts, or amending information held by credit reference agencies.

In a statement yesterday, the regulator said that transitional arrangements replacing a group licence it previously held from the Office of Fair Trading, would expire on 1 April 2015. The original deadline was the end of last month, but the SRA secured a six-month extension.

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) assumed overall responsibility for regulating consumer credit work in April this year.

Error, group does not exist! Check your syntax! (ID: 14)

After next year’s deadline, the only way the SRA could continue to regulate consumer credit work would be if it adopted much or all of the rules used by the FCA.

Crispin Passmore, SRA executive director for policy, said: “Consumer credit regulation is a complex matter. It is vital that clients receive the proper protections, and the FCA are much better placed to regulate these activities than we are.

“We will continue to engage with both the FCA and HM Treasury to find a way forward that provides a workable regulatory framework that protects the interests of clients. But as things stand, we have to consider the option of pulling back from regulating consumer credit activities.”

The SRA launched a consultation yesterday on the best way forward from 1 April 2015, and its possible withdrawal from regulating consumer credit activities

Firms currently carrying out consumer credit activities would be required either to apply for authorisation from the FCA, or stop providing those services.

A spokesman for the SRA added that the FCA’s rules did not fit with the SRA’s regime. “This would add extra regulatory burdens to firms, while the SRA does not have the resources or the expertise in place to supervise firms in the way the FCA requires.”

The consultation closes on 15 December 2014.

Tags: , ,



Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

Do not fear robot lawyers – fear robot clients

Pulat Yunusov

Tech is famous for its shorter and shorter hype cycles. Robot lawyers were all over the twitters only a few months ago and now people actually yell at you for even mentioning the thing. Of course, robot lawyers should not even have surfaced in the first place because no one is remotely close to building them. Lawyers should not fear for their livelihoods. But there is something that is much more important than robot lawyers. It’s robot clients. Or at least the proliferation of machines, automated transactions, and standardized processes where lawyers once controlled the terrain.

September 20th, 2016