15 November 2010Print This Post

Minister “interested in aptitude tests” as survey reveals lawyers’ public school bias

Eton: does reliance on students educated at public schools close the door for the state-educated?

 

Universities minister David Willetts has expressed interest in aptitude testing as a way to address “inequities in earlier educational experience” for those looking to enter the professions, it has emerged. 

The news comes as a survey released today shows that having a public school education makes it seven times more likely you will become a legal professional than if you are state-educated, while Legal Futures can also report that the Legal Services Board (LSB) is leading on the creation of a ‘social mobility toolkit’ for use across the professions. 

The survey, by legal recruiters Laurence Simons, analysed the profiles of 49,600 legal professionals working in London using the business networking website LinkedIn. It found that 7,200 (15%) of them had been educated at one of the UK’s 250 public schools. Just 2% of the general population went to a public school. And it warned that the legal profession is becoming more elitist than ever. 

The findings reinforce the conclusions of research into diversity in the legal profession, commissioned by the LSB and published last month (see story). LSB researchers suggested that the ‘social capital’ which flows from going to the right school can determine whether doors open to a career in the law. 

LSB chief executive Chris Kenny reported to his board recently that Mr Willetts has “a strong personal interest in non-graduate routes to profession, aptitude testing to address inequities in earlier educational experience, fairer access to internships and independent careers advice”. It came at a meeting between Mr Willetts and the executive committee of the Gateways to the Profession Collaborative Forum, which is taking forwards the findings on the Milburn report on fair access to the professions. 

The Bar Standards Board is already piloting aptitude testing for entry on to the bar professional training course, while Legal Futures broke the news that the Law Society is investigating the possibility of introducing a test for the legal practice course (see story). 

The toolkit has been developed by the sub-group of the forum that Mr Kenny chairs, which is tasked with examining how regulators can embed diversity into their strategy and reporting. He reported that it has received “a degree of support from professional bodies and regulators involved in the forum – although this has only been backed with a firm offer of a funding contribution in two cases. We will consider with colleagues from the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills whether other sources of funding can be found to enable the project to go ahead”. 

Laurence Simons ascribed the disproportionate presence of public school-educated lawyers to several factors, such as the consolidation of legal jobs in the south-east and London, where the cost of living is a barrier to poorer candidates. But the most significant barrier to the state-educated is the demise of grammar schools and a decline in academic standards in the state sector, said the company. It highlighted the fact that in the late 1980s, when the last generation educated at grammar school were entering employment, 10% fewer barristers and 15% fewer solicitors were privately educated than in the early 2000s. 

The recruiters found evidence of increasing elitism. Between 1988 and 2004, for example, the proportion of partners under 39 at the five magic circle firms who had been educated in private schools increased from 59% to 71%. They said the increasing reliance on those educated outside the state sector has shifted the social composition of the legal profession. In 1958, just over 40% of lawyers grew up in families with an above average income.  But 60% of British lawyers who were born in 1970 grew up in families with an above average income. 

Laurence Simon director Jason Horobin said: “The figures paint a disturbingly regressive picture of the opportunities open to those wishing to get into law. Social exclusivity is rife in the industry… As far as a candidate’s prospects as a lawyer are concerned, the ability of a student’s school to propel him or her into the best universities will directly affect their employability later on.” 

He continued: “With 53% of magic circle solicitors and 82% of barristers having been educated at Oxbridge, there is a clear link between competitiveness when entering higher education and the ability to achieve a legal career after university.”


By Legal Futures

Tags: , , , ,

Sign up to our free e-newsletter


5 Responses to “Minister “interested in aptitude tests” as survey reveals lawyers’ public school bias”

  1. “the most significant barrier to the state-educated is the demise of grammar schools and a decline in academic standards in the state sector,”

    Oh dear! What is the evidence for this?

  2. Richard Moorhead on November 15th, 2010 at 9:47 am
  3. It really is a farcical notion that aptitude testing will bring about diversity in law. There’s actually some glaring and woeful misconceptions about education at play here. We should be moving away from standardised testing, not increasing it. This will decrease diversity, not increase it.

  4. Jon Harman on November 15th, 2010 at 10:02 am
  5. It’s hard not to be deeply sceptical about these ‘aptitude’ tests. Take a recent study conducted for the BMJ (and published in February) into the first year of the UK Clinical Aptitude Test for school leaver applicants to medical and dental school. It concluded:
    “The test was introduced with high expectation of increasing the diversity and fairness in selection. This study….suggests that it has an inherent favourable bias to male applicants and those from a higher socio-economic class or from independent or grammar schools.”
    So the opposite result from what was intended seems to have been achieved.
    One final thing: private and selective schools are absolute masters at preparing people for tests and exams. The people behind the tests will argue that you can’t prepare for them, but they would say that, wouldn’t they?

  6. Philip Hoult on November 15th, 2010 at 10:59 am
  7. In the U.S., the arrival of aptitude tests like the LSAT and the MCAT has lead to the development of a testing industry not yet known in Europe. Is this really a route we wish to go down?

  8. Anna Zimdars on November 15th, 2010 at 2:01 pm
  9. Whilst I would welcome any initiative which encourages access to the legal professions, and there is undoubtedly more work to be done to support this, I don’t think that this is the most representative survey of the legal professions. In particular, the 82% figure quoted by Jason Horobin is a wildly misleading reflection of the Bar given that the more comprehensive 2007-8 Pupillage Supplementary survey shows that 32% of pupils attended Oxbridge.

  10. Victoria May on November 24th, 2010 at 7:38 pm

Leave a comment

We encourage you to be part of the Legal Futures community but please note that all comments will be moderated before posting. We draw your attention to clause 5 of the Terms and Conditions of the site, which deals with user-generated content.