First ABS wannabes begin SRA application process

Print This Post

By Legal Futures

4 January 2012


Wotton: ABS can provide new opportunities and growth for law firms

More than 10 prospective alternative business structures (ABSs) completed the first stage of the Solicitors Regulation Authority’s (SRA) application process on the first day, the authority has revealed.

SRA figures show that it will spend a minimum of three days considering applications.

Applicants have to submit basic information – including the names of the ABS’s compliance officers – in stage one to receive the substantive application form, which one leading consultant told Legal Futures is “hardly helpful for those either advising or trying to plan an application in advance”.

However, the SRA says its ABS team will “assess the information received and create a bespoke application pack for that organisation. The bespoke pack comprises specific additional forms to gather information depending on the size and nature of the organisation”.

Error, group does not exist! Check your syntax! (ID: 14)

Some potential ABSs have helped the SRA pilot the application form in recent months.

Ann Morgan, who manages the team, added: “The bespoke forms are necessarily very detailed and aim to obtain significant amounts of information from the applicants…

“If we have to engage in further dialogue with firms, they shouldn’t worry or think they’ve done anything wrong. It’s probably going to be standard practice for everyone. What we do know is that we have to be rigorous and robust – as robust as we are with traditional law firms.”

The SRA will then determine the application fee. This will be made

up of an initial payment of £2,000 (based on a day rate of £600 and includes a contribution towards the initial costs of the appellate body, the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT)) and a payment of £150 in relation to each candidate who needs to be approved as a manager, owner and/or compliance officer.

If the SRA’s costs in considering the application exceed these, they will be charged at a day rate of £600. If the SRA has to seek external assistance, it will be charged in full to the applicant body. However, existing legal disciplinary practices with at least one non-lawyer partner – which will have to become ABSs – will not have to pay a fee.

The SRA has up to six months to make a decision, extendable by a further three months. All decisions will be taken by a member of the SRA’s senior management team.

Any appeals against ABS decisions will be managed internally by the SRA in the first instance and ultimately heard by the SDT.

Meanwhile, Law Society president John Wotton said the SRA becoming an ABS licensing authority is important for all solicitors, whether or not they chose to adopt the new business model.

He explained: “The legal profession in England and Wales is the most respected and competitive in the world because it has matched high standards with an approach which welcomes new entrants and business models. This is in the interests of the strength of the profession as a whole and of England & Wales as the leading jurisdiction in the world.

“ABS can provide new opportunities and growth for law firms, but equally those not seeking to adopt ABS have an imperative to be more competitive, accessible and innovative.”

  • Anthony Isaacs, the past president of the SDT and former senior partner of City law firm Stephenson Harwood, received an MBE in the New Year Honours List for services to the legal profession.

Tags: , , ,



One Response to “First ABS wannabes begin SRA application process”

  1. Under the new rules an ABS has to have at least one solicitor (who will also be the COLP), but how would, say a CMC’s, application be assessed if they recruited one 3 yr PQE solicitor merely to do the reserved work and to show they have “tick the boxes”; will the SRA be looking so deep into applications to see what thinking lies behind the structure/staffing of the proposed ABS?

    Will only having one solicitor in the ABS be enough; what would happen in the absence of the COLP, don’t they need a No2 (who would have to be a solicitor)?

    Jonathan Djanogly anticipates that many CMCs will choose ABS as a means of getting around the referral ban so there could be many of them looking at the above model; shouldn’t they be told now whether this model will work or not before they invest?

  2. Brian Rogers on January 4th, 2012 at 2:28 pm

Legal Futures Blog

Know your client checks – A lesson from BHS

Paul-Bennett for Legal Futures

As you will be aware, it is a legal requirement for advisory firms to carry out ‘know your client’ checks. The purpose of doing so is to confirm your client’s identity and to seek to provide protection in respect of anti-money laundering (AML) and terrorist financing laws. The BHS experience before the House of Commons’ work and pensions committee and business, innovation and skills committee shows that firms need to think beyond AML obligations.

September 29th, 2016