Fines for solicitors who ran SDLT avoidance schemes

Print This Post

6 October 2014


Seychelles: solicitors had business registered there

Two partners of a former Yorkshire law firm have been fined by the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal for their involvement in stamp duty land tax (SDLT) avoidance schemes.

Richard Chan and Rajob Ali of Harrogate firm Abode Solicitors – which the Solicitors Regulation Authority shut down in October 2013 over accounts rules failures – were fined £15,000 each by the tribunal, which is at the higher end of the fines usually handed out.

It found that they had not acted in the best interests of their clients, not provided a proper standard of service, failed to act in a way that maintains the trust the public has in solicitors and the provision of legal services, failed to run their business effectively and failed to protect client money and assets.

The tribunal heard on how the pair operated various SDLT avoidance schemes for house buyers. They advised clients on the avoidance scheme through their own separate Seychelles-based business, which took a commission.

Error, group does not exist! Check your syntax! (ID: 14)

It found Mr Chan and Mr Ali liable for 20 breaches, which included failing to act in the best interests of clients, acting where there was a conflict or significant risk of conflict between clients, numerous accounts rules breaches and failing to comply with undertakings.

However, the tribunal decided the SRA did not prove Mr Chan and Mr Ali acted without integrity, nor that they allowed their independence to be compromised, nor that they acted in transactions which were dubious. As well as fining Mr Chan and Mr Ali £15,000, the tribunal ordered them to be jointly liable for costs, which have yet to be agreed.

The two solicitors have 21 days from the publication of the tribunal’s written judgment to appeal.

Last week Legal Futures reported on a regulatory settlement agreement the SRA struck with Surrey law firm Mundays over its involvement in SDLT avoidance schemes, although in that case they were not the firm’s own schemes.

Last year, then SRA chief executive Antony Townsend warned firms against seeing SDLT schemes “as an easy way to make some extra money”.



Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

Do not fear robot lawyers – fear robot clients

Pulat Yunusov

Tech is famous for its shorter and shorter hype cycles. Robot lawyers were all over the twitters only a few months ago and now people actually yell at you for even mentioning the thing. Of course, robot lawyers should not even have surfaced in the first place because no one is remotely close to building them. Lawyers should not fear for their livelihoods. But there is something that is much more important than robot lawyers. It’s robot clients. Or at least the proliferation of machines, automated transactions, and standardized processes where lawyers once controlled the terrain.

September 20th, 2016