Exclusive: Holt to join LegalZoom

Print This Post

11 November 2014


Holt: UK chief

QualitySolicitors founder Craig Holt is joining online legal business LegalZoom – which claims to be the best known legal brand in America – to spearhead its UK expansion, Legal Futures has learned.

We understand that LegalZoom has been in talks with QS for several months ahead of last Friday’s announcement to QS firms that Mr Holt was leaving the network he created in 2008.

LegalZoom, which declined to comment, soft-launched in the UK in late 2013 in association with QS but has had no profile in the year since. A full announcement on its plans is expected shortly.

At the turn of 2014, LegalZoom also sold a large chunk of its business to leading European private equity company Permira, and in a statement at the time the pair said “the Permira funds’ backing strengthens LegalZoom’s ability to move forward with its significant growth plans, which include potential acquisitions in both the US and abroad”.

Permira also jointly owns Acromas, the holding company for the AA and Saga at the time both received alternative business structure licences last year. It has exited the AA investment following the breakdown company’s public listing in the summer, but Acromas remains the majority owner of Saga despite its listing.

Dipan Patel, a principal at Permira, said at the time of the deal: “LegalZoom is a clear leader in the huge untapped market for small business and family law. The company has strong brand recognition, a unique value proposition and a proven track record.”

To date LegalZoom has been behind US rival Rocket Lawyer in its development on this side of the Atlantic, but the recruitment of Mr Holt is a major signal of intent that it has serious plans for the UK.



Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

Rating lawyers by their wins and losses – a good idea?

Robert Ambrogi

Lawyers will give you any number of reasons why their win-loss rates in court are not accurate reflections of their legal skills. Yet a growing number of companies are evaluating lawyers by this standard – compiling and analysing lawyers’ litigation track records to help consumers and businesses make more-informed hiring decisions. The shortcomings of evaluating lawyers by win rates are many. Not least of them is that so few cases ever make it to a win or loss. Of equal concern is that, in the nuances of law practice, it is not always obvious what constitutes a win or a loss.

February 22nd, 2017