“Disruptive” procurement business targets legal market

Print This Post

By Legal Futures

6 June 2012


Letts: legal services exchange will go live this year

A “disruptive” services procurement platform that allows small and medium-sized businesses to put out tenders to an expert community and manage them, all via the cloud, is set to enter the legal market.

Blur Group, which claims to run the world’s largest creative services exchange, is looking for hundreds of commercial firms and lawyers to sign up to its new legal exchange. Though there is no cost to join or pitch for work, Blur takes 20% of the quoted project fee as commission.

Once enough lawyers have signed up, the exchange will go live. Founder and chief executive Philip Letts said he was confident that this would be this year.

The group’s creative services exchange has generated over $11m (£7.1m) of project briefs since 2010, with 800 briefs from 400 businesses – mainly from the UK but also the US and elsewhere – being sent out to expert communities of nearly 20,000 specialists from 135 countries.

Mr Letts said the platform also work as a social exchange, allowing lawyers to build networks and market their credentials even if they are not successful in bidding for work. “We can help lawyers build a community, reduce the cost of business development and provide a platform to more efficiently service their clients,” he said.

Mr Letts argued that his business is “an industry changer”. He explained: “The success of our creative services exchange has shown this, and now our intention is to disrupt practices within additional industries, changing the way companies do business, by building powerful global services exchanges.

“We have proven that expert sourcing, cloud-based platforms and streamlined processes bring demonstrable benefits to both buyers and sellers alike.”
The exchange enables companies to run the entire procurement process – from brief and sourcing to project kick-off, delivery and payment – in one place online, although they are not required to run the project through the system once a pitch has been accepted.

Once a brief is published, the technology and the exchange support team whittles pitches down to a top three for review and selection by the buyer. The pitches have to include a proposed fee, which is paid through the exchange 50% on acceptance and 50% on completion.

 



One Response to ““Disruptive” procurement business targets legal market”

  1. The 20% commission is so much more than is charged by comparable sites in the software space such as oDesk (10%) and Scriptlance (client pays $5 to list and contractor pays 5%) and one should question why the charge should be so high – plenty of room for undercutting by competitors of course.

  2. Peter Rouse on June 8th, 2012 at 3:00 pm

Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

Rating lawyers by their wins and losses – a good idea?

Robert Ambrogi

Lawyers will give you any number of reasons why their win-loss rates in court are not accurate reflections of their legal skills. Yet a growing number of companies are evaluating lawyers by this standard – compiling and analysing lawyers’ litigation track records to help consumers and businesses make more-informed hiring decisions. The shortcomings of evaluating lawyers by win rates are many. Not least of them is that so few cases ever make it to a win or loss. Of equal concern is that, in the nuances of law practice, it is not always obvious what constitutes a win or a loss.

February 22nd, 2017