‘Direct access chambers’ opens for business and lands group action

Print This Post

2 June 2014


Cotswold Barristers

Cotswold Barristers: the first to open in Cheltenham

A set of chambers specialising in direct access cases and working only on a fixed fee basis has opened in Cheltenham.

Cotswold Barristers also claims to have landed the biggest direct access case so far, as a result of its relationship with property investor Mark Alexander.

Chief executive Carla Morris-Papps said Mr Alexander helped found the website Property118.com, where developers and landlords discuss problems and find information, leading to a stream of clients for the chambers.

Ms Morris-Papps said that, as a result, she was recruiting a fourth barrister. The chambers, specialising in property and commercial work, is understood to be the first in Cheltenham.

“Barristers are evolving to become just like solicitors,” Ms Morris-Papps said. “I think the professions will morph into one anyway, though it will take a long time.”

Mark Smith, head of chambers at Cotswold Barristers, qualified as a solicitor at Cartmell & Shepherd in Carlisle in 1986. He became a barrister 10 years later, working primarily on crime and fraud cases.

Having now turned his attention to property work, Mr Smith said he was acting for around 270 clients in a representative action against the West Bromwich Building Society.

He said the issue related to the terms of the building society’s tracker mortgages and whether it could increase interest rates beyond the 1.99% above the base rate initially offered to customers. Mr Smith said proceedings were issued earlier this month and the building society had acknowledged service, but was yet to respond.

Ms Morris-Papps said client funds were kept with BARCO, the Bar Council’s escrow account based at Barclays, avoiding the long delays experienced by some barristers waiting for solicitors to pay them.

She said the use of fixed fees depended on having senior barristers who knew their way round cases.

“We have had plenty of comments from clients delighted about fixed fees,” she said. “Experienced counsel know how long a case will last and what the ramifications are.

“This is how they are able to price their work. If we don’t charge enough, that is something we have to live with.”

Ms Morris-Papps criticised those chambers still charging fees based on the “thickness of the file” or “pulling numbers out of thin air”.

She said her aim was for the chambers to stay quite small, with up to 10 barristers, and focus on quality. “The key for us is quality, not having barristers here just to pay the rent.”

She added that the chambers were housed in an “exquisite” Regency building in the heart of Cheltenham, equipped with state-of-the-art video conferencing facilities.

Barristers have been allowed to conduct litigation since January this year through extensions to their practicing certificates. Cotswold Barristers has organised a seminar with the Public Access Bar Association on the issue, to be held at the Bar Council on 4 June.

Tags: , ,



Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

Rating lawyers by their wins and losses – a good idea?

Robert Ambrogi

Lawyers will give you any number of reasons why their win-loss rates in court are not accurate reflections of their legal skills. Yet a growing number of companies are evaluating lawyers by this standard – compiling and analysing lawyers’ litigation track records to help consumers and businesses make more-informed hiring decisions. The shortcomings of evaluating lawyers by win rates are many. Not least of them is that so few cases ever make it to a win or loss. Of equal concern is that, in the nuances of law practice, it is not always obvious what constitutes a win or a loss.

February 22nd, 2017