Criminal Bar “ready to strike” over fees

Print This Post

By Legal Futures

18 May 2012


Hill: let us remember the option to strike

The criminal Bar is ready to strike in protest at the level of fees paid to both prosecution and defence advocates, a survey by the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) has revealed.

Some 89% of the 1,638 members who responded to the survey said they are prepared to take “direct lawful action”, such as a refusal to attend court; 88% of defence advocates and 77% of prosecution advocates are prepared to refuse to accept new instructions.

In a rallying call at the CBA’s annual dinner tonight, at which he will lay out the findings, chairman Max Hill QC will say: “So let us fight, and let us remember the option to strike. Use the momentum of the past year and of the survey. Demand better treatment. No more cuts, I say, either for the defence or the prosecution. Do not allow them to say that we must take our share of future cuts demanded by the Comprehensive Spending Review.

“The criminal Bar suffered cuts by stagnation in our fees for 15 years before the spending review. Did public sector wages stand still from the mid-90s? Of course not. But our fees did. And when that argument meets with a hostile reaction, as it will, be ready to strike.

Error, group does not exist! Check your syntax! (ID: 14)

“Those of us who completed the survey owe it to the silent workforce to encourage them to come forward too. If we can change the public perception of what we do, we can persuade the whole of the criminal Bar that our careers are worth the fight”.

The survey also revealed that most criminal barristers have suffered delayed payment, while 92% disagree with the introduction of ‘one case, one fee’ on the basis that the advocacy fee is not ring-fenced.

He will urge barristers to “take our argument to the public. Matters cannot be any worse than they are now”. He will quote one respondent to the survey, who said: “The media representation of barristers, particularly defence barristers, needs to be challenged to prevent the continued perpetuation of myths which make us unpopular with the public.”

 

Tags: , ,



Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

Know your client checks – A lesson from BHS

Paul-Bennett for Legal Futures

As you will be aware, it is a legal requirement for advisory firms to carry out ‘know your client’ checks. The purpose of doing so is to confirm your client’s identity and to seek to provide protection in respect of anti-money laundering (AML) and terrorist financing laws. The BHS experience before the House of Commons’ work and pensions committee and business, innovation and skills committee shows that firms need to think beyond AML obligations.

September 29th, 2016