Conveyancers overtake family lawyers in complaints league table

Print This Post

30 January 2015


Conveyancing complaints: sign of the times?

Conveyancing complaints: sign of the times?

Conveyancers have usurped family lawyers as the main cause of complaints to the Legal Ombudsman, its annual report has revealed.

But it also urged lawyers to think twice before pushing for formal decisions rather than accepting informal resolutions to complaints, even though the figures showed that the outcome of the former was less likely to result in the lawyer having to pay the client some money.

Publication of the report – which covers the year to 31 March 2014 – was delayed by several months because of the issues around the expenses of former chief ombudsman Adam Sampson and other financial issues at LeO.

Residential conveyancing accounted for a fifth of all complaints – up from 15% – and commercial conveyancing a further 2%, while 17% of complaints were about family law. “This may suggest an upturn in the housing market and, if it continues, could be a sign of things to come,” said the report.

Error, group does not exist! Check your syntax! (ID: 14)

As in previous years, the next most complained-about areas of law were wills and probate (13%), personal injury (10%) and litigation (9.5%).

In all, the number of ‘contacts’ received by LeO fell slightly to 69,500, of which 19,450 were complaints. After stripping out the 10,541 where the complainant had not yet used the lawyer’s complaints system or were out of time, and the 586 resolved without investigation, 8,323 complaints were formally accepted by LeO, a marginal drop on last year. But another 704 were then closed for not actually being within LeO’s jurisdiction.

The service resolved 8,055 complaints during the year, an increase on 2012/13, which LeO attributed to greater efficiency. No poor service was found in 48% of cases.

The proportion that required a formal ombudsman’s decision continued to go up, to 38%.

“In the majority of cases it is the complainant who requests a decision by an ombudsman,” the report said. “This is consistent with some evidence from other ombudsman schemes that there has been an increase in complainants’ propensity to pursue their complaints as far as possible.

“It may also reflect an increase in the number of lawyers offering reasonable remedies at the first tier, which, if true, is a positive development.”

There was a financial remedy in 40% of cases which went to an ombudsman’s decision, but in 67% of those cases resolved informally at a lower level. Most of the financial remedies were less than £1,000.

The report said: “While lawyers might be tempted to hold out for an ombudsman’s decision, they should factor in the additional time and resource they will have to put into managing the complaint and accept that the customer is likely to walk away feeling even less positive about their firm with the increased risk to their reputation that this entails.”

Only 34% of people were made aware of LeO by their lawyer – up from 27% the year before. “The increase isn’t huge, but it’s a start, and something we hope to build on.”

LeO’s costs continue to fall, with the benchmark cost per case dropping 10% to £1,950, with further cuts planned for this year.



2 Responses to “Conveyancers overtake family lawyers in complaints league table”

  1. Seems to me LeO ought to determine which applications to accept against more stringent criteria as 48% is staggeringly bad.
    Where an offer has been made and the complainant wishes to push the complaint to conclusion should not a fee be charged?

  2. Michael on January 30th, 2015 at 8:21 am
  3. This is an unfortunate reflection of society. There is a substantial body of the public who want legal services for free…..so they see that the easiest way to achieve this is to complain about the service…and hope the lawyer sees it as economical just to pay up!.. We all know just how much it costs us to deal with a complaint

    Friday rant …over !

  4. A Twambley on January 30th, 2015 at 8:37 am

Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

Do not fear robot lawyers – fear robot clients

Pulat Yunusov

Tech is famous for its shorter and shorter hype cycles. Robot lawyers were all over the twitters only a few months ago and now people actually yell at you for even mentioning the thing. Of course, robot lawyers should not even have surfaced in the first place because no one is remotely close to building them. Lawyers should not fear for their livelihoods. But there is something that is much more important than robot lawyers. It’s robot clients. Or at least the proliferation of machines, automated transactions, and standardized processes where lawyers once controlled the terrain.

September 20th, 2016