Consumers start to exert buying power over lawyers, says survey

Print This Post

By Legal Futures

31 May 2012


Davies: concerning that service standards are slipping

There are signs that consumer power is starting to take a grip in the legal services market as more people shop around and demand fixed-fee deals, the Legal Services Consumer Panel reports today.

However, the YouGov survey shows that the wider economic picture is affecting the use of legal services, with 27% of the public using at least one legal service in the last two years, down from 31% in the same survey conducted last year. This affected most areas of consumer law, except crime, immigration, benefits and neighbour disputes, for all of which increases in usage were recorded in 2012.

The panel’s tracker survey, which will inform its second consumer impact report – an annual health check of the Legal Services Act reforms that will be published in July – reported that 22% of consumers now shop around, up from 19% last year, while 58% of privately-paying consumers had a fixed-fee deal. There was evidence that consumers are finding it easier to compare providers.

This led to satisfaction with value for money rising marginally from 56% in 2011 to 58% in 2012. However, satisfaction with individual elements of customer service fell slightly, most notably in relation to clarity of information about costs, dropping from just under 80% to 70%. And dissatisfied consumers are more likely to do nothing – this saw a big increase from 35% in 2011 to 42% in 2012.

Error, group does not exist! Check your syntax! (ID: 14)

Recommendation or previous use were, as usual, the main ways consumers chose a lawyer (33%), followed by referral from a third party (15%), online search (9%) and ‘saw local offices’ (7%) – only 22% of consumers shopped around.

Face-to-face was the main way the service was delivered (42%), followed by e-mail/Internet (20%), telephone (19%) and post (16%). However, there were significant variations depending on the area of law, with personal injury and conveyancing services far more likely to be provided remotely than the average.

The survey recorded a general fall in trust across the professions, including the law, with 43% of the public saying they trusted lawyers, putting them behind doctors and teachers but marginally ahead of accountants.

Panel chair Elisabeth Davies said: “It’s good to see signs of consumers starting to use their buying muscle, although this needs to be just the beginning of a major power shift. Consumers clearly want fixed-fee deals, especially in tough times – and increasingly they are shopping around to get better value for money.

“It’s concerning that service standards are slipping, yet more and more dissatisfied consumers do nothing about the treatment they’ve received. The difficult economic climate is no excuse for lawyers to cut corners, but there’s also a need for regulators to make it easier for consumers who get a poor service to raise their concerns with providers.”

 

Tags:



One Response to “Consumers start to exert buying power over lawyers, says survey”

  1. If you want to get a wee insight into why this may be the case, have a look at the comment on the Law Gazette piece on this http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/trust-lawyers-fallings-says-consumer-panel#comment-16874

    Shows we still have a way to go…

  2. Louise Restell on May 31st, 2012 at 3:09 pm

Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

Know your client checks – A lesson from BHS

Paul-Bennett for Legal Futures

As you will be aware, it is a legal requirement for advisory firms to carry out ‘know your client’ checks. The purpose of doing so is to confirm your client’s identity and to seek to provide protection in respect of anti-money laundering (AML) and terrorist financing laws. The BHS experience before the House of Commons’ work and pensions committee and business, innovation and skills committee shows that firms need to think beyond AML obligations.

September 29th, 2016