Consumers slowly getting the message that they don’t need CMCs, says Financial Ombudsman

Print This Post

By Legal Futures

23 May 2012


 

Insurance: significant number of complaints where no PPI ever existed

There has been a fall in the number of consumers using claims management companies (CMCs) to make complaints about payment protection insurance mis-selling, while some CMCs are “disappointingly lax” in the way they pursue their clients’ cases, the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) has reported.

FOS’s annual review, published yesterday, said that 60% of new cases (157,716) it received in the year to 31 March 2012 were about the sale of PPI, the highest number ever received in a year about a single financial product. In 2010/11 it was 104,597, which in turn was more than double that of the year before.

Some 69% of new cases were brought by CMCs, down from 76% in 2010/11, which FOS said “may reflect the fact that we have taken every opportunity this year to tell consumers that they do not need the help of a CMC”. Last week a row broke out over a call from consumer groups for tighter regulation of CMCs doing PPI work.

Just six CMCs accounted for 51% of cases, with the rest spread across more than 500 CMCs. FOS research found that men are marginally more likely to complain directly without using a CMC, while those aged between 25-54 are more likely than those younger or older to instruct a CMC.

Error, group does not exist! Check your syntax! (ID: 14)

FOS encourages the use of standard documentation for referring PPI disputes, but “we have again seen some CMCs taking a disappointingly lax approach to completing the questionnaire on behalf of consumers. Where a form is completed inaccurately – or not at all – we may not be able to progress the complaint.

“We have made our position on this very clear to the CMCs in question – and we have required a number of them to withdraw their complaints and to re-complete the questionnaire again in full. The quality of the information provided by CMCs to support their clients’ cases also continues to vary significantly.”

FOS added that it also receives a “significant number of cases” where, after investigation, it emerged that no PPI policy had ever been in place.

The annual review also showed a sharp increase in the number of complaints about legal expenses insurance, although at 805 (up from 635), it is a very small figure in the context of the overall number of complaints received by FOS.

 

Tags: ,



Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

Know your client checks – A lesson from BHS

Paul-Bennett for Legal Futures

As you will be aware, it is a legal requirement for advisory firms to carry out ‘know your client’ checks. The purpose of doing so is to confirm your client’s identity and to seek to provide protection in respect of anti-money laundering (AML) and terrorist financing laws. The BHS experience before the House of Commons’ work and pensions committee and business, innovation and skills committee shows that firms need to think beyond AML obligations.

September 29th, 2016