Consumers don’t need to use a lawyer to write their will, banks tell LSB
It is not necessary to use a legally qualified professional to prepare a will, the British Bankers Association (BBA) has insisted.
It said a bank’s in-house unit “produces just as satisfactory a service as a firm of solicitors regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority”.
In its response to the Legal Services Board’s call for evidence on whether to make will-writing, probate and estate administration a reserved legal activity, the BBA said there was “no substantial evidence of consumer detriment” in these areas when provided by banks.
It also pointed out that banks’ services are already regulated by the Financial Services Authority, while “the scale and longevity of banks mean that we have the capital adequacy to put right any errors, if required, without recourse to professional indemnity insurance and are less likely to go out of business than solicitors”.
However, the BBA acknowledged that there was a need for will-writing staff, whether qualified or not, “to be adequately trained, experienced and supervised”.
Training – such as the Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners’ (STEP) qualification – could be limited to those who are in supervision roles, it suggested – “however, it would increase the costs of providing this service that would be passed on to customers”.
“Financial institutions providing these services already use STEP-qualified staff and have in place training and competency schemes and therefore do not think a restriction of a market to legal professionals in this area will improve competency.”
A mystery shopping exercise conducted last year by the Legal Services Consumer Panel scored wills prepared by banks as the best examined.
Meanwhile, a survey by consumer group Which? – also submitted as evidence – found that 75% of the 1,217 members surveyed used a solicitor for their will, with 88% doing so face-to-face. More than two-thirds (68%) said the fees were in line with their expectations, while 12% said they were more expensive.
The use of DIY kits was very low, though younger people were more likely to go down this route (10% of under 45s compared with 3% overall), “so this might suggest a changing market in future”, Which? said. Overall just 2% said they did their will online.
Which? – which offers its own will-writing service – said it did not oppose making will-writing a reserved activity as it would help raise standards and also ensure all work came within the jurisdiction of the Legal Ombudsman.
Tags: Legal Services Board, reserved legal activities, will-writing
One Response to “Consumers don’t need to use a lawyer to write their will, banks tell LSB”
Leave a comment
Legal Futures Blog
Scary Spice
At some stage in your career – probably many years ago – someone will have asked you to describe your perfect job or where you saw yourself in 10 years’ time. Maybe you talked earnestly about your burning desire to bring justice to the masses. More likely, you claimed that your ultimate goal was to be partner in the interviewer’s fine establishment. Chances are you didn’t say: “What I want, what I really really want, is to be a compliance officer for legal practice.” – Allison Wooddisse discusses what firms should include in a COLP’s job description.
Associate News
VTUK integrate ETSOS ordering platform into sales software
Making the most of your press releases
Survey reveals urgent action is needed against online abuse
Peppermint apprentices – you’re hired!
Free kit for sole practitioners interested in being a virtual practice
Choose your weapons and take on the big competitors, New Dawn conference urges
Record rainfall highlights future insurance issues









Oh dear! Only a satisfactory service! Why not an excellent one?
Banks not going bust? Read thisismoney.co.uk/safe-savings
Training. Do i read this as saying that having trained staff to supervise the unqualified staff might be a bit expensive