Consumers don’t need to use a lawyer to write their will, banks tell LSB
It is not necessary to use a legally qualified professional to prepare a will, the British Bankers Association (BBA) has insisted.
It said a bank’s in-house unit “produces just as satisfactory a service as a firm of solicitors regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority”.
In its response to the Legal Services Board’s call for evidence on whether to make will-writing, probate and estate administration a reserved legal activity, the BBA said there was “no substantial evidence of consumer detriment” in these areas when provided by banks.
It also pointed out that banks’ services are already regulated by the Financial Services Authority, while “the scale and longevity of banks mean that we have the capital adequacy to put right any errors, if required, without recourse to professional indemnity insurance and are less likely to go out of business than solicitors”.
However, the BBA acknowledged that there was a need for will-writing staff, whether qualified or not, “to be adequately trained, experienced and supervised”.
Training – such as the Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners’ (STEP) qualification – could be limited to those who are in supervision roles, it suggested – “however, it would increase the costs of providing this service that would be passed on to customers”.
“Financial institutions providing these services already use STEP-qualified staff and have in place training and competency schemes and therefore do not think a restriction of a market to legal professionals in this area will improve competency.”
A mystery shopping exercise conducted last year by the Legal Services Consumer Panel scored wills prepared by banks as the best examined.
Meanwhile, a survey by consumer group Which? – also submitted as evidence – found that 75% of the 1,217 members surveyed used a solicitor for their will, with 88% doing so face-to-face. More than two-thirds (68%) said the fees were in line with their expectations, while 12% said they were more expensive.
The use of DIY kits was very low, though younger people were more likely to go down this route (10% of under 45s compared with 3% overall), “so this might suggest a changing market in future”, Which? said. Overall just 2% said they did their will online.
Which? – which offers its own will-writing service – said it did not oppose making will-writing a reserved activity as it would help raise standards and also ensure all work came within the jurisdiction of the Legal Ombudsman.
Tags: Legal Services Board, reserved legal activities, will-writing
One Response to “Consumers don’t need to use a lawyer to write their will, banks tell LSB”
Leave a comment
Legal Futures Blog
Taking a sip from a fire hydrant
Metrics, KPIs, benchmarking, six sigma and lean process mapping. It might seem far removed from the day-to-day work of an in-house lawyer – yet these were some of the themes under discussion during a recent meeting of the LexisNexis In-house Advisory Board, explains Will Long of LexisNexis.
Associate News
Gosschalks looks to push the boundaries of client services through next generation technology
The Peppermint Legal Service Platform has arrived
LexisPSL announces corporate crime product to help law firms provide full service to corporate clients
TikitTFB product launch at the Legal IT Show 2012
SOS to champion ‘Law Firm Success’ at Legal IT Show 2012
Lawyer to Lawyer – a marketplace enabling the sale and purchase of legal work between law firms – launches in the UK
Riverview Law selects Peppermint Platform









Oh dear! Only a satisfactory service! Why not an excellent one?
Banks not going bust? Read thisismoney.co.uk/safe-savings
Training. Do i read this as saying that having trained staff to supervise the unqualified staff might be a bit expensive