BSB fires warning shot over SRA regulation

Print This Post

By Legal Futures

11 April 2010


Happy client: detailed rules may be needed to ensure consumer confidence

The Bar Standards Board (BSB) has fired a warning shot across the bows of its solicitor counterpart, warning that “there will be instances where outcomes-based regulation is likely to be inadequate on its own, even if supplemented by guidance”.

Responding to the Solicitors Regulation Authority’s (SRA) consultation Achieving the right outcomes, which set out the SRA’s strategy to introduce outcomes-focused regulation, the BSB said that “simplifying and clarifying existing regulation should not mean that it should be any less rigorous”.

It continued: “The BSB remains concerned that outcomes-based principles may be too vague to deal with certain scenarios unless supported by at least some binding rules.  Without such rules there is a risk that ‘simplification’ is merely a watering down of differing levels of regulation found to be appropriate for different regulators.”

The SRA has indicated that despite intending to reduce the size of the Solicitors Code of Conduct as part of the move towards outcomes-focused regulation, it will retain detailed rules where necessary to protect consumers.

The BSB response said that while flexibility can be helpful, the importance attached to process should not be underestimated. “For example, requirements as to behaviour of lawyers and employees, and others are outcomes which can be achieved only over a longer period of experience in operating the new regime. This is important for consumer confidence.

“Whilst outcomes may be set at a high level, there is still the question of how they are actually achieved.  A more prescriptive approach should be taken where there is good reason to do so. It is important to ensure that it can be demonstrated how the outcomes might be secured in practice.”

Tags: , ,



Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

Rating lawyers by their wins and losses – a good idea?

Robert Ambrogi

Lawyers will give you any number of reasons why their win-loss rates in court are not accurate reflections of their legal skills. Yet a growing number of companies are evaluating lawyers by this standard – compiling and analysing lawyers’ litigation track records to help consumers and businesses make more-informed hiring decisions. The shortcomings of evaluating lawyers by win rates are many. Not least of them is that so few cases ever make it to a win or loss. Of equal concern is that, in the nuances of law practice, it is not always obvious what constitutes a win or a loss.

February 22nd, 2017