Bar chairman warns on post-Brexit practising rights

Print This Post

6 July 2016


chantal-aimee doerries

Doerries: European links “more important than ever”

The ramifications of leaving the European Union are likely to be wide-ranging and could restrict the ability of barristers to practise outside England and Wales, the chairman of the Bar Council has warned.

Chantal-Aimee Doerries QC said other post-Brexit “issues” included the VAT position on European work, employment rights and immigration matters “to mention but a few”.

Announcing the formation of a working group to review the impact of Brexit on barristers and on the jurisdiction, Ms Doerries said the Bar could not afford to be complacent and must prepare for “what the future might look like outside the European Union”.

She went on: “We will seek to inform the public debate on the issues where they affect the profession, and our justice system. We will also seek, where possible, to provide practical advice to barristers.

“The ramifications are likely to be wide-ranging. For example, issues are likely to arise in relation to the extent to which we can practise outside England & Wales (both within Europe and also beyond where our rights stem from a European trade treaty),  in relation to the VAT position concerning European work, in relation to immigration issues and in relation to employee rights to mention but a few.

“There is also the question of who the Lord Chancellor will be, and also the need to ensure that the new government is committed to our justice system, and funding publicly funded work.”

In a blog for the Bar Council website, Ms Doerries said the Bar was committed to working with its partners in Europe even if the UK was, in future, was outside the EU.

“The links which the Bar Council and the Bar have with lawyers and with Bar associations in Europe and around the rest of the world are more important than ever.

“We will look to maintain strong links for the profession in overseas markets and we will send a clear signal to our colleagues overseas that despite last week’s referendum, the Bar of England & Wales remains open for business and a partner for other Bars around the world.”

Ms Doerries said the long-term effect of Brexit on the legal services sector’s contribution to the UK economy depended “significantly” on the nature and terms of the post-Brexit relationship with the EU, and with other important markets.

“However, I am confident that London will remain a leading centre for international dispute resolution. The global legal services market has seen significant growth over the past decade as a result of increasing international trade and growth in developing economies.

“This has led to a growing demand for legal services. The UK currently has the largest share of the European legal services market. A substantial contribution to this is made by the continued demand by parties (from the EU and beyond) for the services UK professionals offer, both for transactional work, and, in the case of London in particular, as a venue for litigation and arbitration.”

Meanwhile a spokeswoman for the Law Society said chief executive Catherine Dixon had written to Lord Chancellor Michael Gove, offering its expertise to the government.

Ms Dixon said issues likely to come up included maintaining access to the single market, practice rights, the financial services passporting arrangements, mutual enforcement of judgments, extradition arrangements and maintaining the European Arrest Warrant.

“This is a time to work together in the national interest,” she added.

Tags: , ,



Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

Rating lawyers by their wins and losses – a good idea?

Robert Ambrogi

Lawyers will give you any number of reasons why their win-loss rates in court are not accurate reflections of their legal skills. Yet a growing number of companies are evaluating lawyers by this standard – compiling and analysing lawyers’ litigation track records to help consumers and businesses make more-informed hiring decisions. The shortcomings of evaluating lawyers by win rates are many. Not least of them is that so few cases ever make it to a win or loss. Of equal concern is that, in the nuances of law practice, it is not always obvious what constitutes a win or a loss.

February 22nd, 2017