Accountants recruit solicitor to head new regulatory arm

Print This Post

22 October 2015


Michael Caplan

Caplan: board will help maintain public confidence

Michael Caplan QC, one of the few solicitor QCs and a partner at Kingsley Napley for over 30 years, has been recruited by the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW) to head its new regulatory board.

The appointment panel was chaired by another solicitor, Dame Janet Gaymer, a leading employment lawyer.

The number of accountancy firms authorised or licensed by the ICAEW to provide probate services passed 100 this summer. Among them were 69 alternative business structures.

The ICAEW said it set up the new regulatory board to “enhance further” the distinction between its representative and regulatory roles, following a governance review carried out by Sir Christopher Kelly. It also puts the ICAEW in line with Legal Services Board requirements for separation of regulation and representation.

Sir Christopher is a former permanent secretary who became chairman of the Committee on Standards in Public Life and last year published a report on The Co-operative Bank.

Mr Caplan, a former chairman of the Solicitors Association of Higher Court Advocates, has acted as a part-time Crown Court judge for many years and is authorised to sit as a deputy High Court judge.

Dame Janet commented: “As an independent panel, we were set the task of finding an inaugural chair for the ICAEW regulatory board, who not only has the skills to drive the creation of the new structure but who also has the necessary experience and stature to command public confidence.

“With Michael Caplan, we believe we have found the right person to take on this role.”

Mr Caplan commented: “As chair, I want to ensure that ICAEW has a regulatory board in place that helps to maintain public confidence in ICAEW as a regulator and in the reputation of the accountancy profession more generally.

“I look forward to working with the board’s members and ICAEW staff as well as the profession’s oversight bodies.”

Tags: , ,



Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

Rating lawyers by their wins and losses – a good idea?

Robert Ambrogi

Lawyers will give you any number of reasons why their win-loss rates in court are not accurate reflections of their legal skills. Yet a growing number of companies are evaluating lawyers by this standard – compiling and analysing lawyers’ litigation track records to help consumers and businesses make more-informed hiring decisions. The shortcomings of evaluating lawyers by win rates are many. Not least of them is that so few cases ever make it to a win or loss. Of equal concern is that, in the nuances of law practice, it is not always obvious what constitutes a win or a loss.

February 22nd, 2017