ABS pressures put 2,500 law firms “at risk of failure”

Print This Post

4 July 2013

Shut for good: ABSs are real threat to small firms

Competition from alternative business structures (ABSs) has increased pressure on law firms to the point that 2,500 are at risk of financial failure in the coming year, according to business recovery specialists.

Upcoming tax bills are set only to exacerbate the situation, according to the Association of Business Recovery Professionals, better known as R3.

Using data from company information firm Bureau van Dijk, R3 estimated that 31% of all law firms (2,556 practices) are at risk, with the situation worst in London, and best in Wales and Yorkshire.

The news comes at a time when the Solicitors Regulation Authority has highlighted financial instability as the main current threat to the profession.

“By opening up the legal market, the Legal Services Act has increased competition at a time when there is already pressure on client budgets and over supply in the sector, and this combination of factors poses a real threat particularly for small high street firms,” explained Robert Adamson, chair of R3 in Yorkshire.

“Already, we have seen a great deal of consolidation in the regional legal market with a number of mergers such as that of Keeble Hawson and hlw Commercial Lawyers LLP; DWF’s acquisition of Cobbetts; and the recent merger of Dickinson Dees with Bond Pearce.

“This is a trend that we expect to see continuing with small practices unable to afford the level of branding and marketing or the technology to compete with alternative business structures.”

He said partners in law firms will this month have to make their second tax payment of the year, “which can be a real squeeze on cash flow if it hasn’t been carefully planned for”.

“Ideally, a tax reserve fund will have been maintained for this purpose and this should be monitored and steps taken to apply for a reduction of payments on account if earnings are expected to reduce over the coming year.”

Tags: ,

2 Responses to “ABS pressures put 2,500 law firms “at risk of failure””

  1. If teh information supplied by R3 and the SRA is correct, and there is no reason to suggest it is not, what is to happen next? Where is the strategy to fix this or are market forces going to pick up the pieces. Surely it is better to put in place some remedies now rather than leave it well alone. Every time a law firm is forced to close its doors it is an administrative nightmare for all concerned – the regulator, the staff and the clients. A little forethought and planning now will save a whole lot of angst later. Where is the Law Society and SRA???

  2. Ashley Balls on July 8th, 2013 at 10:59 pm
  3. There are many well managed firms, but there are more that have relied on the legal team to manage the business. With the advent of new legal service providers and ABS’s, one will note that many have ‘corporate structures’, professional leadership and management team, commercially focused and run, investing for the future, often heavy on branding, IT to enable easy access, and client service. When are the legal team led firms going to recognise that they could be better positioned if there was dedicated, professional management.

  4. Kim Archer on July 29th, 2013 at 5:08 pm

Leave a comment

* Denotes required field

All comments will be moderated before posting. Please see our Terms and Conditions

Legal Futures Blog

GDPR and the rise of ‘datanapping’ – the new threat to the pockets of law firms

Nigel Wright

You’ve heard about ransomware – a hacker infiltrates your IT systems, locking them down until you pay a ransom. Some studies now estimate that over 50% of businesses have experienced this type of attack in the last year, and it’s particularly prevalent within the legal sector. Previously, firms could protect themselves by having a solid disaster recovery plan in place to ensure they can get back up and running in the event of a disruption. However, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) – the new EU-wide regime which comes in effect on 25 May 2018, irrespective of Brexit – means that this approach alone is no longer adequate and security measures must be strengthened to prevent attacks.

April 21st, 2017